CONTRA EL PINGALISMO CASTRISTA/ "Se que no existe el consuelo que no existe la anhelada tierrra de mis suenos ni la desgarrada vision de nuestros heroes. Pero te seguimos buscando, patria,..." - Reinaldo Arenas

Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta Partido Republicano. Mostrar todas las entradas
Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta Partido Republicano. Mostrar todas las entradas

viernes, mayo 10, 2013

Conservatives, Liberals and Government - Study

Fundamental to our understanding of democratic politics across the developed world is that conservative parties stand for relatively low levels of government spending, while those on the left of the political spectrum are prone to higher spending. A new study, released yesterday by the Montreal Economic Institute (MEI), blows a hole through that conventional wisdom.
“When you look at the behaviours of various parties over long periods of time in different governments, the pattern is that there is no pattern,” said MEI’s president and chief executive officer, Michel Kelly-Gagnon in an interview with me yesterday. “The parties that are supposed to be more in favour of big government end up spending less than we might expect. And the parties that are supposed to be fiscally conservative sometimes end up being spendthrifts.”
MEI’s study examined government spending in Canada, Quebec and the U.S., dating back to the Pierre Trudeau, Robert Bourassa and Richard Nixon administrations respectively. “In all three cases,” reads the report, “it is actually left-wing governments that most reduced the relative size of government.”
MEI reports government size as the ratio of public spending to gross domestic product.
Under Liberal Prime Ministers Jean Chrétien and Paul Martin, that ratio fell by 32.5%. The current government, under the leadership of Conservative Prime Minister Stephen Harper, drove the ratio up after the financial crisis. It has since reduced the size of government to roughly where it was when the Conservatives took office in 2006.
In the U.S., Republican President George Bush grew the ratio more than any other, by 39%. Democratic President Bill Clinton shrank it by 14.3%.
Is this simply a matter of parties running for office from the left or right, as the cliché goes, and then governing from the centre? Partly, said Kelly-Gagnon. “Parties, when they form governments, regardless of their declared ideology, have to be responsive to the economic environment.”
Context matters, Kelly-Gagnon told me. Clinton’s numbers look great because he enjoyed strong gross domestic product growth during his presidency. Harper had a financial crisis to deal with, and he therefore had to implement a level of stimulus spending that ran contrary to his party’s small government plans.
Public spending as a share of GDP of government
Quebec
United States
The report draws two conclusions. First, our perceptions about left- and right-wing political ideology don’t reflect the realities of the last four decades. The data tell a far more nuanced story. Second, we’re far better positioned to debate the role (and size) of government in a non-partisan fashion than we might have expected. The fact that actual decision-making hasn’t been as tied down by ideology as we may have thought means we can be more pragmatic about, for example, the austerity-stimulus debate that continues to rage around the developed world.
It’s worth a try, anyway.

Share/Bookmark

miércoles, mayo 01, 2013

Cuban-Canadian-American Ted Cruz ’16? Texas senator’s path might not be so easy

es.wikipedia.org
Conservative firebrand Ted Cruz, the Texas senator whose service in office is just four months long, is considering a bid for the Republican presidential nomination in 2016, according to a report on Wednesday by National Review.
The Texas Republican has quickly won the fervent support of grassroots conservatives since his election last November by breaking with Senate convention to aggressively challenge Democrats – and some Republicans, too. Citing anonymous sources, the National Review article suggested Cruz might look to quickly capitalize on his newfound fame, and rally conservatives behind his candidacy.
But there are significant barriers to Cruz winning the GOP nod in 2016, let alone winning the White House. Here are a few of them:
Cruz would face tough conservative competitionWhile Cruz has charmed figures ranging from conservative bloggers to former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, he could encounter a Republican primary field that would hardly cede the most conservative bloc within the GOP to Cruz. 
It’s easy to conceive of a series of Republican presidential hopefuls – Florida Sen. Marco Rubio, Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul, Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker (and possibly more) – vying for the same segment of the Republican primary vote as Cruz. Any one of those candidates will almost encounter difficulty in harnessing the political power of the Tea Party, a movement that has never been particularly well-known for acting in concert.
Fantasy vs. realityIf Texas Gov. Rick Perry’s bid for the Republican nomination in 2012 taught political observers anything, it’s that being a potential candidate is always easier to execute than being an actual candidate.
Conservatives, searching for an alternative to the establishment-backed favorite, Mitt Romney, practically begged Perry to make a late entry into the primary. They extolled his conservatism and the positive jobs situation in Texas, arguing that his record, combined with a top-notch team of consultants, would make Perry the new favorite for the GOP nomination.
Of course, things didn’t turn out that way. Perry withered under the national spotlight and the scrutiny of rival Republican candidates. Recent history is littered with examples of similar primary candidates, like Democratic hopeful Wesley Clark in 2004, and former Sen. Fred Thompson’s foray into the GOP primary of 2008. Their candidacies fizzled after having won broad acclaim at their outset.
Cruz would almost certainly face stiff opposition in a Republican primary that could expose any of his flaws as a politician. Wednesday’s National Review article cited Cruz’s experience as an award-winning debater, but his performances in those contests have never been filtered through the prism of rival campaigns or the national media.
The establishment would strike backCruz’s path to the GOP nomination would almost certainly rely on an outside strategy in which he courts conservative activists and rails against the party establishment in Washington. But would the D.C. establishment necessarily take that kind of criticism while sitting down?
In 2012, the GOP establishment quickly rallied around Romney, if only after it became apparent that there would be no other serious contenders for the presidency available. And when it seemed as though the more conservative Rick Santorum might emerge to dethrone Romney during the primaries, there were serious rumblings that GOP money men might scramble to find an alternative candidate who they regarded as more formidable versus President Barack Obama in the general election.
Given Cruz’s conservatism, it isn’t tough to imagine the GOP establishment rallying around a candidate perceived as more electable to if a Cruz candidacy  came too close to victory.
It doesn’t help Cruz that he’s forged few alliances during his short time in the nation’s capital. He most recently derided many of his congressional colleagues as “squishes,” and spoke publicly about internal Republican debates that were supposed to remain confidential. Cruz has worked with a few fellow conservatives, but two of them – Paul and Rubio – could end up being rival candidates for the GOP nomination in 2016.
Oh, Canada!The National Review article acknowledges that Cruz advisers are prepared for a legal challenge to his eligibility to serve as president, reminiscent of the “birther” attacks conservatives had leveled against Obama for much of his first term. 
At issue is Cruz’s birthplace. He was born in Calgary, Canada, the son of a Cuban refugee father and a U.S. citizen mother. Having been born outside the continental U.S., he would have to address questions about whether he is a “natural born” U.S. citizen, which the Constitution requires of a prospective president.
But even if Cruz is able to offer up all the evidence in the world of his eligibility, it’s not tough to imagine Democratic candidates and super PACs relishing in the chance to give a Republican his comeuppance, and turn the “birther” phenomenon back against a GOP hopeful. 
He’s barely a blip in the polls right nowCruz could certainly raise his national profile in the next few years, but the Texas senator hasn’t yet registered as a contender for the GOP nomination in any credible poll testing the 2016 field.
A Quinnipiac University poll at the beginning of last month found that Rubio was the slight, early favorite among Republican primary voters; 19 percent of them said they would favor the Florida senator as their nominee in 2016. And while other contenders like Paul, Walker, New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush and Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell all registered some level of support, Cruz did not.
Cruz still faces the challenge of building his reputation outside of conservative, Washington-focused circles. But he still has plenty of upside, too; having been a figure on the national stage for such a short period of time, Cruz’s name ID among primary voters has virtually nowhere to go but up.

Share/Bookmark

jueves, abril 25, 2013

Barbara Bush Doesn't Want Jeb To Run

Former first ladies Barbara Bush on Jeb's potential presidential run "He's by far the best qualified man, but no, I really don't. I think it's a great country. There are a lot of great families, and it's not just four families or whatever. There are other people out there that are very qualified. We've had enough Bushes."

"He'll get all our enemies, half of our friends." 


Share/Bookmark

martes, marzo 05, 2013

Rush: The real reason Republicans lose


PALM BEACH, Fla. – Radio host Rush Limbaugh says there’s a relatively simple reason why Republicans have not been able to win the presidency in the last two election cycles: they don’t have conservative candidates at the top of the ticket.
“That’s why we’re losing, because we keep nominating moderates,” Limbaugh claimed Tuesday on his top-rated national radio show.
He referred to former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, the 2012 GOP nominee for the White House, as “one of the most decent men ever to run for the presidency in my lifetime and probably in many people’s lifetimes.”
“A totally decent guy,” he continued, “but four million Republicans didn’t vote in 2012. Four million fewer than did in 2008. The Republican conservative base stayed home. Had they voted, we wouldn’t be talking about Obama’s second term. There wouldn’t be one.”
Limbaugh noted: “In politics, if we had at the electoral level somebody who could articulate conservatism passionately and from the heart without a teleprompter, without notes, we wouldn’t be in this mess. People respond to it when it’s properly explained. But it’s been so castigated, besmirched, impugned that many conservatives are defensive about it.
“And now there’s a popular movement: ‘Well, we’re gonna have to moderate our stand on immigration, we have to actually maybe be for amnesty. Moderate our view on abortion and kind of forget about the social issues. We’re gonna have to forget being concerned about any kind of morality now. That’s the only way we’re gonna get re-elected. And that’s why we’re losing.”

Share/Bookmark

martes, febrero 26, 2013

Get 'off your ass': Boehner blasts Senate Democrats


Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy
firstread
House Speaker John Boehner addresses the ongoing sequester standoff on Capitol Hill.
Echoing the frustration of lawmakers throughout Washington hoping for a last-minute swerve to avoid impending budget cuts, House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, used some PG-13 phraseology Tuesday to urge the Senate to action. "We have moved a bill in the House twice," Boehner said at a press conference Tuesday. "We should not have to move a third bill before the Senate gets off their ass and begins to do something." The refrain of urging Senate action comes from Boehner just four days before the sequestration cuts are slated to kick in. President Barack Obama will travel to Newport News, Va. this afternoon to highlight the cuts' effect on the region's shipbuilding community. He will be joined by the area's Rep. Scott Rigell, a Republican. The White House's road trips to warn of the sequester's impact have drawn criticism from foes. "He has traveled over 5000 miles the last two weeks, and we challenge him travel a mile and half and come to Capitol Hill," said Rep. Cathy McMorris Rogers of Washington on Tuesday. "Sit down with Harry Reid and urge the Senate Democrats to take action."
Boehner said Obama's event this afternoon will reduce the nation's military to a campaign "prop."
"I don't think the president is focused on finding a solution to the sequester," he said. "The president has been traveling all over the country, today by going down to Newport News in order to use our military men and women as a prop in yet another campaign rally to support his tax hikes."
Share/Bookmark

lunes, febrero 25, 2013

Washington's sequester standoff drags on: 'Mr. President, you got your tax increase'

The nation’s capital was enveloped in a familiar kind of gridlock late Monday, as Republicans again demanded that President Barack Obama and Senate Democrats act first to put off $85 billion in automatic cuts slated to take effect on Friday.
“The president says we have to have another tax increase to avoid the sequester,” House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, said of the hefty and indiscriminate spending cuts. “Well, Mr. President, you got your tax increase. It's time to cut spending.”
As Congress returned to work following a weeklong recess, the Obama administration and lawmakers appeared no closer to resolving the automatic spending cuts before their Friday deadline. While both Democrats and Republicans bemoan the cuts as potentially catastrophic for the economy and the national defense, both sides have been locked in a virtual staring match over the sequester.

Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy
More on firstread >>
Share/Bookmark

viernes, febrero 22, 2013

GOP fears Obama will jilt them on immigration

www.christianpost.com
A recurring fear has colored Republicans’ attitude toward the current immigration reform debate in Congress: President Barack Obama has no actual interest in reaching a deal, and is instead pursuing the issue to exacerbate the GOP’s problems with Hispanic voters.
Yet all of the evidence so far – whether in his speeches and or his relations with Congress – suggests he and his administration clearly want a deal that he could sign into law.
Politics, of course, play an undeniable role in the renewed effort to overhaul the nation’s immigration laws, especially given that Obama won more than 70 percent of the Latino vote in the 2012 election. Consequently, Republicans who had previously resisted any legislation that offered a pathway to citizenship for the nation’s some 11 million undocumented immigrants have now reversed course.
“The Republican Party is losing the support of our Hispanic citizens and we realize that there are many issues on which we think we are in agreement with our Hispanic citizens but this is a preeminent issue with those citizens,” Arizona Sen. John McCain, a Republican member of the bipartisan Senate group working toward an immigration accord, said bluntly upon the introduction of that proposal’s framework.
But Republicans have warily engaged the new debate over immigration with active fears that the president’s true intentions on immigration are half-hearted, at best.
Texas Sen. Ted Cruz, who’s established himself as an outspoken conservative after just a couple of months on the job, was only the latest Republican to give voice to that fear.
“I don’t believe President Obama wants an immigration bill to pass, instead I think he wants a political issue,” he said in a speech on Wednesday, according to a report by the Houston Chronicle. ”His objective is to push so much on the table that he forces Republicans walk away from the table because then he wants to use that issue in 2014 and 2016 as a divisive wedge issue.”
It’s a fear that many of Cruz’s fellow elected Republicans appear to share.
“The question that many of us are asking, Republicans and Democrats, is he looking to play politics or does he want to solve the problem?” Wisconsin Rep. Paul Ryan, the former GOP vice presidential nominee, asked during his Jan. 27 appearance on NBC's “Meet the Press” preceding Obama’s major policy speech on immigration.
Republicans carefully watched that speech with concerns that Obama would eventually demagogue immigration. The president generally did the opposite; he used the speech to carefully embrace the bipartisan Senate talks, while warning that the administration would have its own backup plan at the ready for congressional consideration should the Senate talks fail. He further embraced a bipartisan speech in prime time, during his State of the Union address.
“As we speak, bipartisan groups in both chambers are working diligently to draft a bill, and I applaud their efforts,” Obama said. “So let’s get this done. Send me a comprehensive immigration reform bill in the next few months, and I will sign it right away.”
But Republicans’ concerns that Obama will jilt the GOP on immigration very much inform the work toward a comprehensive reform law, and help explain part of the reason why the politics of the issue are so fraught.
When a draft of the White House’s immigration reform proposal leaked over the weekend, Marco Rubio, the Florida Republican who is helping negotiate the Senate plan, pronounced it dead on arrival in Congress.

Keep reading on firstread >>
Share/Bookmark

miércoles, febrero 20, 2013

YOU MADE IT, NOW FIX IT: Boehner Says Obama Must Own Up to Sequester Crisis

House Speaker John Boehner had a simple message Wednesday for President Obama after he used the bully pulpit to blame Republicans for the "meat cleaver" of looming spending cuts: You created it, you fix it.
"Having first proposed and demanded the sequester, it would make sense that the president lead the effort to replace it," Boehner wrote in a Wall Street Journal op-ed.
The "sequester" is the Washington word for the $85 billion in 2013 spending cuts set to hit starting March 1, with more than $1 trillion in cuts on tap over the next decade. Boehner and Obama both agree that the federal budget needs that level of deficit reduction and more, but sharply disagree over how to achieve it. In the absence of any compromise, the set of indiscriminate cuts which would hit the military hardest are set to take hold in less than two weeks.
The president on Tuesday, surrounded by first responders who are among those who would see cutbacks, called on House Republicans to drop their resistance to tax increases and steer the country away from the budget "meat cleaver."
But Boehner reminded Obama that the automatic cut idea was originally proffered by the White House during the debt-ceiling talks of 2011. He said Congress "reluctantly accepted the president's demand" and claimed it's now up to Obama to find the escape hatch.
"So, as the president's outrage about the sequester grows in coming days, Republicans have a simple response: Mr. President, we agree that your sequester is bad policy. What spending are you willing to cut to replace it?" Boehner asked.
White House Communications Director Dan Pfeiffer rejected what he described as "revisionist history." The White House acknowledges the "sequester" came from their office, but argues that Congress was on board at the time. The original plan was to tee up cuts so Draconian that Congress would be compelled to strike a deal to replace them -- Congress, though, failed to do so.
While Boehner blames Democratic resistance to spending and entitlement cuts, Obama blames GOP resistance to closing tax loopholes.
"(Obama) is willing to make tough choices. Now it's time for the speaker to do the same. The speaker has yet to name one tax loophole he's willing to close. Not one," Pfeiffer said.
White House Press Secretary Jay Carney also said Tuesday that Congress "must act" to avert the spending cuts, putting the onus on congressional Republicans. "It is bad policy," he said.
The back-and-forth was further evidence that the two sides are drifting further apart as the deadline nears, and that chances of a deal in the near-term are fading.
The president spoke Tuesday at the White House, urging Congress to come up with a short-term fix to cancel sweeping cuts to defense and other programs set to hit March 1.
"These cuts are not smart. They are not fair. They will hurt our economy. They will add hundreds of thousands of Americans to the unemployment rolls," Obama said. "This is not an abstraction -- people will lose their jobs."
The president ticked off a host of expected repercussions should the $85 billion in cuts for this year take effect. He said Border Patrol, emergency responders, FBI agents, airport controllers and others would all face cutbacks. He said teachers would be laid off by the thousands and America's military would be degraded.
But Congress is out for the week, effectively leaving one more workweek to reach a deal, or a stopgap, before the deadline.
Shortly before he spoke, Obama was also dealt a blunt warning by former Republican Sen. Alan Simpson, who co-chaired the president's deficit-reduction commission.
Simpson warned that Obama "will have a failed presidency" unless he deals "honestly" with entitlements, saying programs like Medicare and Social Security must be dealt with in order to get the country on a sustainable path.
"If he wants to leave it alone and not deal with those two biggies, forget the rest of the stuff -- he'll have a failed presidency," Simpson told Fox News.
While Obama says opposition to tax hikes is holding up a deal, Republicans say Democrats' resistance to major changes to entitlements are a big part of the problem.
Simpson and Erskine Bowles, the former co-chairmen of the president's deficit-reduction commission who for years have been urging Washington to stop kicking the can, got in front of the president early Tuesday morning to push a plan of their own.
The two fiscal hawks pitched a plan to avert the looming spending cuts -- heavy cuts to defense and other programs that they describe as "abrupt" and "mindless" -- and instead enact a $2.4 trillion deficit reduction plan over 10 years.
A quarter would come from changes to health care spending, a quarter would come from closing tax loopholes and the rest would come from spending reductions including a stingier adjustment of Social Security's cost of living increases.
On tax reform, the plan presents a middle ground -- by using the savings from closing loopholes to both lower rates and bring down the deficit. By contrast, Obama has pushed to use that savings mostly to reduce the deficit, while Republicans have pushed to use it to bring down rates. 

Share/Bookmark

martes, febrero 19, 2013

Obama pins blame on Republicans for looming cuts, as fiscal hawk warns of 'failed presidency'

President Obama pinned the blame on Republicans Tuesday for looming spending cuts that may be triggered by what was originally a White House proposal -- while a former leader of the president's deficit commission said it's Obama who's on the path to a "failed presidency" if he can't tackle the debt. 
The president spoke Tuesday at the White House, urging Congress to come up with a short-term fix to cancel sweeping cuts to defense and other programs set to hit March 1. 
"These cuts are not smart. They are not fair. They will hurt our economy. They will add hundreds of thousands of Americans to the unemployment rolls," Obama said. "This is not an abstraction -- people will lose their jobs." 
The president ticked off a host of expected repercussions should the $85 billion in cuts for this year take effect. He said Border Patrol, emergency responders, FBI agents, airport controllers and others would all face cutbacks. He said teachers would be laid off by the thousands and America's military would be degraded. 
As he has before, Obama urged Congress to pass a stopgap to allow for more time to pass a bigger package. But, with Congress out this week and many lawmakers resisting another attempt to kick the can on the cuts, Obama tried to cast Republicans as the ones responsible. 
Obama suggested their resistance to his calls to pass a "balanced" package -- by closing tax loopholes for top earners and big corporations -- is the hold-up. He asked whether Republicans are willing to let hundreds of thousands of people lose their jobs "just to protect a few special-interest tax loopholes." 
He blamed the current stalemate on "partisan recklessness and ideological rigidity." 
House Speaker John Boehner, after Obama talked, claimed Obama was merely reinforcing what Republicans have been saying -- "his sequester is the wrong way to cut spending." Boehner and others note the so-called sequester -- which set up more than $1 trillion in sweeping spending cuts if Congress failed, as it did, to reach a compromise on deficit reduction -- originated in the White House. 
"But once again, the president offered no credible plan that can pass Congress -- only more calls for higher taxes," Boehner said.
White House Press Secretary Jay Carney acknowledged that the idea was originally "put forward" by the White House. But he said the White House only pitched it as an "absolute necessity" in 2011 to avoid default over the debt ceiling, and noted Republicans "embraced" it at the time. 
Shortly before he spoke, Obama was also dealt a blunt warning by former Republican Sen. Alan Simpson, who co-chaired the president's deficit-reduction commission. 
Simpson warned that Obama "will have a failed presidency" unless he deals "honestly" with entitlements, saying programs like Medicare and Social Security must be dealt with in order to get the country on a sustainable path.  
"If he wants to leave it alone and not deal with those two biggies, forget the rest of the stuff -- he'll have a failed presidency," Simpson told Fox News. 
While Obama says opposition to tax hikes is holding up a deal, Republicans say Democrats' resistance to major changes to entitlements are a big part of the problem. 
Simpson and Erskine Bowles, the former co-chairmen of the president's deficit-reduction commission who for years have been urging Washington to stop kicking the can, got in front of the president early Tuesday morning to push a plan of their own. 
"Over the medium and long-term, our debt is projected to continue growing faster than the economy. It is simply on an unsustainable path," they said in a statement. 
The two fiscal hawks pitched a plan to avert the looming spending cuts -- heavy cuts to defense and other programs that they describe as "abrupt" and "mindless" -- and instead enact a $2.4 trillion deficit reduction plan over 10 years. 
A quarter would come from changes to health care spending, a quarter would come from closing tax loopholes and the rest would come from spending reductions including a stingier adjustment of Social Security's cost of living increases. 
On tax reform, the plan presents a middle ground -- by using the savings from closing loopholes to both lower rates and bring down the deficit. By contrast, Obama has pushed to use that savings mostly to reduce the deficit, while Republicans have pushed to use it to bring down rates. 
Simpson and Bowles cast their plan as building on the proposal from the president's deficit commission -- a plan that Congress never adopted and Obama never fully endorsed. 
Obama, fresh off a three-day Florida golfing trip, pressed his own case during the event at the White House Tuesday morning. Emergency responders, a group of workers the White House says could be affected if state and local governments lose federal money as a result of the cuts, joined him. 
The $85 billion in cuts, known as the sequester, will start taking effect on March 1 unless Congress acts. The White House says the sequester could derail an economy still suffering from high unemployment and sluggish growth. 
Obama wants to offset the sequester through a combination of targeted spending cuts and increased tax revenue. The White House is backing a proposal unveiled last week by Senate Democrats that is in line with the president's principles. 
But that plan was met with an icy reception by Republicans, who oppose raising more tax revenue in order to offset the cuts. GOP leaders say the president got the tax increases he wanted at the beginning of the year when Congress agreed to raise taxes on family income exceeding $450,000 a year. 
The Democrats propose to generate revenue by plugging some tax loopholes. Those include tax breaks for the oil and natural gas industry and businesses that have sent jobs overseas, and by taxing millionaires at a rate of at least 30 percent. 
Some Republicans, including House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan, R-Wis., have advocated plugging loopholes, but as part of a discussion on a tax overhaul, not sequestration. 
"Loopholes are necessary for tax reform," Ryan said Sunday on ABC's "This Week." `'If you take them for spending, you're blocking tax reform and you're really not getting the deficit under control." 
The sequester was first set to begin taking effect on Jan. 1. But as part of the "fiscal cliff" negotiations, the White House and lawmakers agreed to push it off for two months in order to create space to work on a larger budget deal. 

Share/Bookmark

jueves, febrero 14, 2013

Corporate Socialism

By Laika 
www.cosmosmith.com
Well, who would've imagined... now we have Republicans and Democrats joining hands in a great demonstration of bipartisanship and amazingly quick action by the usually gridlocked Congress... for what? Corporate Socialism in America! Working folks lose their jobs (outsourced abroad), can't pay their mortgages, lose their homes, and its tough luck. Big creditors on Wall Street get a $700 billion bail-out courtesy of the taxpayers. I thought capitalism was supposed to be about natural market forces, smart businessmen making sound investments and being rewarded with profits that trickle down... creating jobs, paying wages, stimulating consumer spending.... Now we have the federal government subsidizing failed financial institutions. With this $700 billion bail-out on top of the Iraq war debt, my children, grandchildren and great-grandchildren will all be paying for it with their taxes (if the whole house of cards does not come tumbling down soon). Why the sudden urgency, you might ask? Hmmm... the election in six weeks might have something to do with it, maybe?  At last we have something liberals and conservatives can agree on.  Bye bye Free Market Capitalism; hello Corporate Socialism.

Share/Bookmark

domingo, febrero 10, 2013

BUDGET TALKS: Dems, GOP Far Apart as Cuts Seem 'Inevitable'

Congressional Democrats and Republicans appeared far apart Sunday on a deal to avert $85 billion in federal spending reductions next month, with a top House Republican saying the cuts appear “inevitable.”
The automatic cuts, known as sequester, kick in March 1 because the parties have failed to agree on a less-drastic plan to cut the federal budget and deficit.
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi told “Fox News Sunday” that Democrats remain steadfast about tax increases being part of the deal but remain open to spending cuts.
“What we do need is more revenue and new cuts,” the California congresswoman said.
Pelosi said Democrats were “not talking about raising taxes,” but want to close tax loopholes, including those for U.S. oil companies.
She also argued Democrats have made $1.6 trillion in cuts over the past two years and suggested the bigger solution to the country’s economic problems is job growth.
Her argument is similar to the one President Obama -- who also has suggested stopping sequester with a mix of tax cuts and spending cut -- is expected to restate Tuesday during his State of the Union address.
“We need a big, balanced, bold proposal,” said Pelosi, arguing more jobs result in more revenue. The interview was taped last week.
However, Oklahoma Rep. Tom Cole said fellow House Republicans will “absolutely not” accept tax increases as part of a deal, which would trigger the cuts to federal defense and discretionary spending.
Cole told ABC News’ “This Week” that the president refused to agree to spending cuts during the recent, so-called “fiscal cliff” negotiations so Democrats are not getting revenue increases now.
“I think (sequester) is inevitable, quite frankly,” he said.
Arizona Republican Sen. John McCain also said Sunday that Republicans don’t want tax increases, considering they just agreed to end more than $1 trillion in income tax breaks, but suggested he might be open to closing some tax loopholes.
He also urged both parties to work together to avoid sequester, which will result in big cuts to the defense budget and roughly $1.2 trillion in total cuts over the next decade.
“I’ll take responsibility as a Republican, but we’ve got to avoid it,” said McCain, the top Republican on the Senate Armed Services Committee. “The world is a very dangerous place.”

Share/Bookmark

miércoles, febrero 06, 2013

Rubio to deliver GOP response to State of the Union

washingtonpost
Marco Rubio’s selection to deliver the Republican response to President Obama’s State of the Union cements the Florida senator’s role as a first-among-equals when it comes to the future leaders of the party, and sets up an intriguing dynamic over the next few years between Rubio and the man he almost certainly wants to replace.
Marco Rubio. AFP/Getty Images
Marco Rubio. AFP/Getty Images
That Congressional Republicans chose Rubio to carry the party’s flag is, frankly, not at all surprising. It’s no secret that Rubio is the single most marketable product in the Republican party today;  he’s young (41 years old), Hispanic and conservative without being frightening to voters outside of the party base. He is also, without question, the most gifted communicator in the party — a natural ability that evokes, dare we write it, Barack Obama. (For more on Rubio’s abilities, check out the piece we wrote following his speech at the Republican National Convention speech.)
“He is the most natural communicator in put party since Reagan, and I’ve not said that of anyone before,” said Ed Gillespie, former chairman of the Republican National Convention of Rubio. “When he speaks it’s like someone tapped a tuning fork. He just hums.”
Rubio is, to be blunt, the obvious choice — particularly with his recent leadership on a compromise immigration reform measure, a piece of legislation that is of massive import to the GOP’s future political prospects.
The more intriguing narrative that unspools from the choice of Rubio is how Tuesday night’s speech likely kicks off a period in which the GOP puts the Florida senator forward as its de facto foil to President Obama.
The simple truth is that the national Republican party lacks a leader at the moment, someone who can effectively articulate a counter-message to the one Obama is delivering to the country.
For much of 2011 and 2012 that role was occupied by House Speaker John Boehner thanks to the GOP’s majority in that chamber. But Boehner was always a bad fit.
First, Boehner’s prime concern was, is and always will be the care and feeding of what has become an increasingly conservative Republican majority in the House. Boehner’s messaging, therefore, was always calibrated to the 200+ House Republicans, not the American public writ large.
Second, Boehner isn’t — and, to his credit, doesn’t claim to be — a communicator on the level of Obama. He is blunt and occasionally short-tempered, traits that are of value when leading a group like House Republicans but are less useful when trying to re-brand the GOP for moderate and independent voters across the country.
Third, Boehner’s failure late last year to round up votes for his so-called “Plan B” during the fiscal cliff debate — a proposal that would have exempted all but those making $1 million or more from a tax increase — proved that he lacks the sort of control over his caucus required to lead it, let alone the Republican Party.
The leadership vacuum caused by Boehner’s struggles has contributed in no small part to the seemingly catch-as-catch-can approach the party has taken to its political tactics and strategy over the last few months.
On the fiscal cliff and the debt ceiling, the party backed down for fear of picking a fight it couldn’t win with Obama. On immigration, a handful of Senate Republicans (including Rubio) looks to be moving forward but with no signoff from the House majority on the idea of a path to citizenship for undocumented workers.
Enter (at least in theory) Rubio. In addition to his natural political skills, Rubio has also proven decidedly deft at navigating between the tea party and the GOP establishment during his brief time in the Senate. That decidedly rare skill — Boehner, Mitt Romney, John McCain and many others lack it — coupled with the sense that Rubio is the person best positioned to put a Republican back in the White House in 2016 — could well provide the momentum he needs to be the GOP’s answer, figuratively and literally, to President Obama.
Now, with all that said, it’s important not to overstate the import of the Republican State of the Union response. Most of these responses are forgotten almost as soon as they are delivered. And while the political world loves to cite Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal’s weak performance in 2009 as a sign of how much damage a poor speech can do, is there anyone who thinks Jindal’s prospects as a 2016 candidate have been materially affected by that speech?
What’s clear from Rubio’s selection as the State of the Union responder is that the national Republican Party both recognizes his ability and understands its own need to begin to elevate a national messenger to contend with President Obama over the next few years. Rubio has long been the expected inheritor of that role; his State of the Union response formalizes it.

Share/Bookmark

Parece que a Joe Garcia no le gusta la pelota

By hernandez01
Pensar mal es de pícaros, sin embargo, un viejo sabio (como casi todos los viejos cubanos que vivieron la era pre tiranía), alguna vez me dijo: “a veces hay que pensar mal para que te sorprenda el bien, que cae mejor y hace menos daño…”
Debo regresar al sistema encuestas del Nuevo Herald, esta vez, de la sección deportiva, que es una de las que “bien baila”, por la tendencia a destacar los logros “de los equipos Cuba” y de “los atletas cubanos” con tanta rutina que aburre, incluso por medio de informaciones desde La Habana que no editan, con evidente carácter proselitista procastrista.
¿”Cree usted que los Marlins mejorarían con Jeb Bush como dueño”?, una aparente inocentada, pero solo aparente…
Las “encuesticas” del diario miamense deben estar clasificadas como mediciones de popularidad que, según “los números que arrojen”, las tomarían como base los “tanques pensantes” del partido demócrata, que deciden igualmente la política pro castrista a imponer en Estados Unidos (posiblemente fuera también), para determinar el rumbo de los acontecimientos en la batalla por el poder zonal-nacional.
Sería una soberana estupidez y un error de proporciones catastróficas, aceptar que, detrás de la “proposición” al público para que opine y considere la habilidad del hijo menor del Héroe de la 2da Guerra Mundial y ex presidente George sr, como parte de un grupo comprador (es un rumor) del equipo de casa, prevalezca la “generosamente infantil” opción de seleccionarlo por su buena voluntad y por la decencia del ex gobernador para mejorar el club que, nadie lo dude, si sucediera, lo haría championable en una temporada y media.
Resulta que el periódico no es reconocido por tener una actitud de condescendencia con nada conservador; resulta que miles de veces intentaron barrer el piso con el mismo individuo al que, hoy, ponen en una balanza como digno de confianza y credibilidad con respecto a la posible salvación de uno de “los símbolos de Miami”; el mismo al que tuvieron que dispararse durante dos períodos, porque su capacidad, su limpieza y su proyección social, además de su condición patriótica heredada, se les convirtió en valladar insalvable para sus instintos carroñeros.
¿Cómo el partido demócrata dejó pasar la oportunidad de presentar otro grupo que incluyera a los mandamases de la FNCA, con Joe entre ellos, para piquetear (propagandistamente) contra Jeb, que así habría que haber visto el lance si se “tiraban”?
Bueno, tal vez “se les fue”, tal vez no lograron el equipo comprador que necesitaban… sin embargo, me da la impresión de que este survey de popularidad, está dirigido a analizar el número de personas a tener en cuenta que crea que Bush está capacitado para hacer cosas importantes, inteligentes, decentes y con la firmeza de un… presidente, no del club, sino del país, que son otros cinco pesos.
Después y, a partir de lo anterior, iniciar la preparación de la propaganda sucia pertinente a largo plazo a que acostumbran, tanto el Nuevo Herald como toda la media antiamericana, tal vez el 95 % del país, ratificado hace poco por datos reveladores de Donald Trump por los mecanismos para proteger a Obama.
Joe García no podrá ser nunca ni un “soñador” con la silla presidencial de Estados Unidos, pero Jeb Bush sí.
Al modo mío de ver las cosas, si se presentara a elecciones-2016, sería el más formidable candidato posible para desbancar al antiamericanismo que rige el destino del mundo hoy desde la Casa Blanca.
Para conocer cuántos confían en la Florida (estado de importancia en elecciones generales) en la capacidad de Jeb Bush para arreglar lo que casi nadie puede, lo que han convertido en un patiñero indecente y corrupto quienes han hecho valer su instinto antipopular con abuso de poder, es que se producen encuesticas como esas.

Share/Bookmark

Jeb Bush Closer to 2016 Run

www.theatlantic.com
Former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush will speak for the first time at the annual Conservative Political Action Conference, a clear sign that he is mulling a run for the Republican presidential nomination in 2016.

The American Conservative Union, which sponsors the conference, announced Tuesday that Bush will address the group, set for March 14-16 in National Harbor, Md., just outside Washington. Bush has been invited by the group to speak at CPAC several times, but this will be his first appearance.

“We are pleased to announce that my friend Gov. Jeb Bush will be a featured speaker at CPAC 2013,” ACU Chairman Al Cardenas said in a statement.

“We look forward to welcoming him to the CPAC stage for the first time in March.”

Bush served as Florida governor for two terms and since leaving office in 2006 has been vocal about the Republican Party’s need to reach out to minorities. He’s also been critical of the Republican Party’s failure to embrace comprehensive immigration reform and made education policy a key priority during his time leading Florida.

News that Bush will take the stage at the conference comes as The National Review reports that Bush this week is meeting in Washington with a number of cabinet members of his brother, former President George W. Bush. When asked to comment directly on the rumors the meeting was tied to a forthcoming run, Bush would only say the meeting was about education policy.

Bush was one of the nation’s first governors to push through comprehensive education reform. Florida’s plan has since been modeled by 36 states.

Share/Bookmark

President Obama trying to checkmate the Republican Party


Share/Bookmark

GOP Blasts Obama Stopgap Fix

 
President Obama is running into a buzzsaw of Republican criticism that his latest call for a stopgap fix to avert automatic budget cuts is an unserious proposal that would once again lock in permanent tax hikes without addressing the country's spending.
The president is heading to Annapolis, Md., Wednesday to sell that and other policy proposals to Senate Democrats at their annual retreat. With Congress facing a March 1 deadline before sweeping defense and other cuts kick in, Obama on Tuesday said the best thing to do if they can't meet that deadline is to pass a package of "spending cuts and tax reforms" that would push off the deadline for a "few more months."
But Republican leaders roundly rejected the idea.
"It's just more of the same," House Republican Leader Eric Cantor told Fox News.
Cantor and others accused the president of once again "kicking the can" on the debt crisis -- and further, they claimed that after the fiscal-crisis deal yielded a tax rate increase on top earners, Obama and his Democratic allies are trying to squeeze in more tax hikes in lieu of spending cuts.
Republicans also want to replace the indiscriminate spending cuts set to hit March 1. But they want to replace them with other spending cuts.
"(Obama) wants to continue down the path of insinuating that somehow taxpayers have got to put more and more money in, when the problem is spending," Cantor said, urging the president to "lead" on the issue of passing a comprehensive replacement bill.
At issue are the spending cuts set into motion by the 2011 deal to raise the debt ceiling. As part of that deal, Congress teed up more than $1 trillion in defense and other spending cuts unless lawmakers found an alternative that achieved similar deficit reduction. They didn't. Lawmakers, as part of the fiscal crisis deal at the end of 2012, delayed the automatic budget cuts for two months. The next deadline is March 1.
Obama, in a brief statement Tuesday at the White House, urged Congress to give itself time by passing another stopgap.
"There is no reason that the jobs of thousands of Americans ... not to mention the growth of the entire economy, should be put in jeopardy just because folks in Washington couldn't come together," Obama said
Noting that Congress is currently working on a broader package, Obama said "at the very least we should give them a chance to come up with this budget instead of making indiscriminate cuts now that would cost us jobs and significantly slow down our economy."
The move, though, raised renewed concerns among Republicans that Obama, after winning tax hikes on top earners during the fiscal-crisis talks, would push anew for more tax increases.
"We believe there is a better way to reduce the deficit, but Americans do not support sacrificing real spending cuts for more tax hikes," House Speaker John Boehner said in a statement.
Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell accused Obama of wanting to "delay" the cuts "for a few months with more permanent tax hikes at a time when American families are already feeling the pinch of the Obama economy."
He called on the president to propose "significant spending reforms."
"The clock is ticking. It's time to get serious," McConnell said.
Obama is not calling for increases in tax rates, like the kind enacted in the fiscal-crisis deal. Rather, he wants to close loopholes and deductions to raise revenue.
But while Obama wants to use that revenue to close the deficit, some Republicans say that revenue should be used to in turn lower rates and boost the economy.
"I'm disappointed the president today attempted to unilaterally change the terms of the debate on tax reform," Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., said in a statement. "Tax reform does not mean closing loopholes to solely pay down the deficit.  Tax reform means closing loopholes to primarily lower rates for working families in order to promote economic growth, which has the effect of increasing tax revenues for the federal government."
Meanwhile, lawmakers across Capitol Hill are putting out dueling proposals to deal with the March 1 deadline.
The Congressional Progressive Caucus, a group of liberal House Democrats, on Tuesday unveiled a bill that would cancel the looming spending cuts and replace them with tax hikes. It would also cut $300 billion from the Pentagon and divert it to "job creation."
House Republicans are sure to oppose the bill.
Republicans on the armed services committees in both chambers are expected to unveil a proposal of their own on Wednesday.
The automatic cuts add up to roughly $1 trillion over 10 years. While many lawmakers are still committed to achieving that level of deficit reduction and more, the fact that half the cuts hit the Pentagon -- which is already dealing with cutbacks -- and the other half hit domestic programs favored by Democrats has made the current course unpalatable in Washington.
For more than a year, though, lawmakers have been unable to figure out an alternative that is amenable to both sides.

Share/Bookmark

lunes, enero 21, 2013

ALERT: CBS' Dickerson to Obama: 'Go for the Throat' of GOP

A column published on Slate.com over the weekend urged President Obama to "pulverize" and destroy his Republican opponents -- even "go for the throat" -- in order to "cement his legacy."
The words of advice, though, didn't come from a Democratic strategist or a former member of the president's inner circle.
The nearly 2,000-word playbook came from CBS News' political director John Dickerson.
Dickerson, who also works as chief political correspondent for Slate, had some unusually harsh words for the minority party as Obama takes the oath and launches into his second term.
To hear Dickerson tell it, Republicans have proved so intransigent that Obama's only option is to obliterate them. The subhead on the article said, "Obama must declare war on the Republican Party" if he wants to transform American politics.
"There's no indication that the president's clashes with House Republicans will end soon," Dickerson wrote. "The president who came into office speaking in lofty terms about bipartisanship and cooperation can only cement his legacy if he destroys the GOP. If he wants to transform American politics, he must go for the throat."
Dickerson went on to describe the strategy of picking off and cultivating a few Republican allies as "the old way."
"Obama's only remaining option is to pulverize," Dickerson said. He wrote that Obama's attempt to build a "post-partisan" Washington didn't work, and in his second term Obama has the chance to "hasten the demise of the old order" of the GOP by "increasing the political cost of having the GOP coalition defined by Second Amendment absolutists, climate science deniers, supporters of 'self-deportation' and the pure no-tax wing."
The advice comes despite the eventual willingness of the Republican Party to allow tax increases on top earners, as part of the recent fiscal crisis deal.
Republicans have also eased off their opposition to raising the debt ceiling, proposing a three-month extension while a budget is debated.
Dickerson was named CBS' political director in November 2011.
Representatives from CBS News have not yet responded to requests for comment.

Share/Bookmark

sábado, enero 19, 2013

GOP Hits Snag With No-Pay Plan

House Republicans might run into a snag in trying to suspend congressional pay as a way to nudge budget negotiations along: the U.S. Constitution.
As part of a proposal to raise the debt limit for three months, the House GOP would suspend pay for members of Congress unless both the House and the Senate pass a budget blueprint for the next fiscal year.
The measure plays to public disaffection with Congress, which has been locked in a bitter spending battle, and appeals to the small-government wing of the Republican Party, which doesn’t like government spending to begin with. It is also a dig at Senate Democrats, who have gone for years without adopting a budget plan.
The problem is that immediately withholding pay from lawmakers may be unconstitutional. The 27th amendment states no law changing compensation for members of the House or the Senate can take effect until after the next House election. That means a law, even if it were to clear the Democratic-controlled Senate, which is a long shot, could not be used to withhold pay for almost two years.
To read more from The Wall Street Journal, click here >>
Share/Bookmark

viernes, enero 18, 2013

KRAUTHAMMER: How to Save the Republican Party

FoxNews.com/ By Charles Krauthammer
davidbrin.com
WASHINGTON –  It has become conventional wisdom that Republicans are suffering an internal split that President Obama is successfully exploiting to neuter the Republican House. It is not true, however, that the Republican split is philosophical and fundamental. And that a hopelessly divided GOP is therefore headed for decline, perhaps irrelevance.
In fact, the split is tactical, not philosophical; short-term, not fundamental. And therefore quite solvable.
How do we know? Simple thought experiment: Imagine that we had a Republican president. Would the party be deeply divided over policy, at war with itself in Congress? Not at all. It would be rallying around something like the Paul Ryan budget that twice passed the House with near 100 percent GOP unanimity.
In reality, Republicans have a broad consensus on program and policy. But they don't have the power. What divides Republicans today is a straightforward tactical question: Can you govern from one house of Congress? Should you even try?
Can you shrink government, restrain spending, bring a modicum of fiscal sanity to the country when the president and a blocking Senate have no intention of doing so?
One faction feels committed to try. It wishes to carry out its small-government electoral promises and will cast no vote inconsistent with that philosophy. These are the House Republicans who voted no on the "fiscal cliff" deal because it raised taxes without touching spending. Indeed, it increased spending with its crazy-quilt crony-capitalist tax "credits" -- for wind power and other indulgences.
They were willing to risk the fiscal cliff. Today they are willing to risk a breach of the debt ceiling and even a government shutdown rather than collaborate with Obama's tax-and-spend second-term agenda.
The other view is that you cannot govern from the House. The reason Ryan and John Boehner finally voted yes on the lousy fiscal-cliff deal is that by then there was nowhere else to go. Republicans could not afford to bear the blame (however unfair) for a $4.5 trillion across-the-board tax hike and a Pentagon hollowed out by sequester.
The party establishment is coming around to the view that if you try to govern from one house -- e.g., force spending cuts with cliffhanging brinkmanship -- you lose. You not only don't get the cuts. You get the blame for rattled markets and economic uncertainty. You get humiliated by having to cave in the end. And you get opinion polls ranking you below head lice and colonoscopies in popularity.
There is history here. The Gingrich Revolution ran aground when it tried to govern from Congress, losing badly to President Clinton over government shutdowns. Nor did the modern insurgents do any better in the 2011 debt-ceiling and 2012 fiscal-cliff showdowns with Obama.
Obama's post-election arrogance and intransigence can put you in a fighting mood. I sympathize. But I'm tending toward the realist view: Don't force the issue when you don't have the power.
The debt-ceiling deadline is coming up. You can demand commensurate spending cuts, the usual, reasonable Republican offer. But you won't get them. Obama will hold out. And, at the eleventh hour, you will have to give in as you get universally blamed for market gyrations and threatened credit downgrades.
The more prudent course would be to find some offer that cannot be refused, a short-term trade-off utterly unassailable and straightforward. For example, offer to extend the debt ceiling through, say, May 1, in exchange for the Senate delivering a budget by that date -- after four years of lawlessly refusing to produce one.
Not much. But it would (a) highlight the Democrats' fiscal recklessness, (b) force Senate Democrats to make public their fiscal choices and (c) keep the debt ceiling alive as an ongoing pressure point for future incremental demands.
Go small and simple. Forget about forcing tax reform or entitlement cuts or anything major. If Obama wants to recklessly expand government, well, as he says, he won the election.
Republicans should simply block what they can. Further tax hikes, for example. The general rule is: From a single house of Congress you can resist but you cannot impose.
Aren't you failing the country, say the insurgents? Answer: The country chose Obama. He gets four years.
Want to save the Republic? Win the next election. Don't immolate yourself trying to save liberalism from itself. If your conservative philosophy is indeed right, winning will come. As Margaret Thatcher said serenely of the Labor Party socialists she later overthrew: "They always run out of other people's money."

Share/Bookmark

DEMS ON FENCE? Senate Dems Won't Commit To Assault Weapons Ban

Read >>
Share/Bookmark
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

"EN TIEMPOS DIFÍCILES" - Heberto Padilla

A aquel hombre le pidieron su tiempo

para que lo juntara al tiempo de la Historia.

Le pidieron las manos,

porque para una época difícil

nada hay mejor que un par de buenas manos.

Le pidieron los ojos

que alguna vez tuvieron lágrimas

para que contemplara el lado claro

(especialmente el lado claro de la vida)

porque para el horror basta un ojo de asombro.

Le pidieron sus labios

resecos y cuarteados para afirmar,

para erigir, con cada afirmación, un sueño

(el-alto-sueño);

le pidieron las piernas

duras y nudosas

(sus viejas piernas andariegas),

porque en tiempos difíciles

¿algo hay mejor que un par de piernas

para la construcción o la trinchera?

Le pidieron el bosque que lo nutrió de niño,

con su árbol obediente.

Le pidieron el pecho, el corazón, los hombros.

Le dijeron

que eso era estrictamente necesario.

Le explicaron después

que toda esta donación resultaria inútil.

sin entregar la lengua,

porque en tiempos difíciles

nada es tan útil para atajar el odio o la mentira.

Y finalmente le rogaron

que, por favor, echase a andar,

porque en tiempos difíciles

esta es, sin duda, la prueba decisiva.

"Las fotos de Felipe"/ OLPL

Etiquetas

"Reflexiones" de Fidel (17) 1984 (1) 2010 (8) 2011 (7) 2012 (9) 2013 (10) 3-D (9) 4-D (1) 911 (41) aberraciones (1) aborigenes (2) Aborto (7) Abuso (1) Abuso infantil (5) Abuso Sexual (2) academia (39) academia cubana (123) Accidentes (91) activismo politico (8) activismo social (1) activista digital (3) actor Cuba (5) actrices (5) actrices cubanas (3) Actualidad (2) Acueductos y alcantarillados (6) Acuerdos militares (1) Adan Chavez (1) Adeiny Hechavarria (1) adn (1) aeropuertos (2) Afectaciones (3) Afganistan (126) Africa (18) Agencias de noticias (2) agenda 21 (2) Agenda de Raul (27) Agentes (23) Agentes cubanos en el exterior (90) agentes de influencia (16) agentes en el exterior (8) Agitadores (1) Agricultura (134) agua (1) Agua potable (15) Ahmadinejad (8) Ahmadineyad (4) Ai Weiwei (2) Ai Weiwie (2) ajedrez (9) Al Gore (1) al jazeera (15) Al Qaeda (132) Al Yazira (1) alan gross (117) Alarcon (12) Alaska (3) ALBA (63) albania (4) Albert Camus (1) ALCA (1) Alcholismo (6) Alcibiades Hidalgo (3) alcoholismo (3) Alejandro Armengol (2) Alejandro Castro Espin (11) Alemania (54) alex jones (75) alexei ramirez (1) alexis cuba (1) alexis vila (9) alfa 66 (1) alfredo guevara (3) Alfredo Pong (69) algeria (5) Aliados (1) Alimentacion (72) Alimentos (192) alina fernandez (4) Alinsky (2) Allende (8) alvaro vargas llosa (1) alz (1) Alzados (2) alzheimer (5) amaury gutierrez (1) amazonas (2) ameh (1) America (10) America Latina (9) american dream (1) Amistad (1) Amnistia (1) Amnistia Internacional (9) amor (3) Ana Belen Montes (8) Ana Frank (1) Analisis economico (93) Analisis politico (201) analisis social (14) anarquismo (6) ancianos (12) andre malraux (1) andrei sajarov (3) Andrew Breitbart (4) Andy Garcia (3) Angel Castro (3) Angel Santiesteban (6) Angela Merkel (5) Angelina Jolie (5) Angola (7) Animales (166) anita ekberg (1) anna chapman (7) Anonymous (5) ANPP (7) Antartica (5) Antenas (2) anticapitalismo (2) Anticastrismo (44) antigravity (1) Antiguedades (3) Antimotines (1) antisemitismo (2) Antonio Castro (5) Antonio Rodiles (10) antrax (2) Antropologia (21) Antunez (49) Apertura (1) apple (2) Arabe (6) Arabia Saudita (29) Archivo Cuba (2) argelia (7) Argentina (30) Ariel Sigler Amaya (5) Armamentismo (16) Armando Lago (1) Armas (210) armas biologicas (1) armas de destruccion masivas (5) armas laser (5) armas nucleares (149) armas quimicas (7) Armenia (1) Aroldis Chapman (10) arqueologia (9) Arquitectura (11) Arquitectura cubana (19) arroz (3) arte (66) arte cubano (21) Arte. Cuba (10) Artico (12) artistas cubanos (20) Artistas y Escritores cubanos (21) Arturo Lopez-Levi (3) Asamblea Nacional (37) Asesinatos (23) Asignacion (1) asilo (1) Asteroides (4) astrobiologia (8) Astrofisica (21) Astronautica (103) Astronomia (81) Ataque cibernetico (29) atares (1) Atentado (3) Aung San Suu Kyi (11) Australia (23) austria (1) Autismo (8) Autos (66) Aviacion (176) Aviones cubanos (6) Awareness (1) Ayuda a las victimas (37) ayuda externa (2) Azerbaijan (4) Azucar (14) bacardi. Cuba (3) bahamas (3) bahrein (20) Ballet Cubano (16) Balseros (69) bancarrota (3) Banco Mundial (10) Bancos (74) bandas juveniles (4) bangladesh (4) Barack Obama (1192) Barbarroja (3) barcos (27) barhein (3) barquin (1) Bashar al Assad (7) Bashar Assad (2) Batista (3) BBC (3) belarus (5) belgica (8) bellator (38) bellator. hector lompard (1) Benemelis (8) Benjamin Netanyahu (2) Benoit Mandelbrot (1) berlusconi (3) Berta Soler (22) bielorusia (5) bienestar (1) Bieolorusia (3) bilderberg (8) Bill Clinton (12) Bill Gates (5) Bill O'Reilly (35) bimillonarios (3) Biocombustibles (3) Bioetica (1) biologia (2) bionica (3) Biotecnologia (10) Bioterrorismo (6) birmania (10) Bitcoin (5) black (4) Black Power (18) blogguer (15) Blogoestroika (8) Blogs (59) Blogs cubanos (313) Blogs ranking (4) Blogs-premios (5) bloguer (4) Bloqueo (8) Bloqueo interno (2) bob dylan (3) bob marley (2) bobby fisher (3) Bodega cubana (1) body language (1) boing boing (2) Bolivia (30) bolsa (17) bonzo (1) bosnia (3) Boxeadores cubanos (156) Boxeo (160) Boxeo cubano (143) Bradley Manning (5) Brasil (67) Brian Latell (6) brigada 2506 (10) Bruno Rodriquez (1) Budismo (1) bulgaria (6) Burma (1) Buro Politico (1) burocracia (3) CaCastrismo (1) Cachao Lopez (1) Cadecas (1) Calle 13 (1) Cambio climatico (57) Cambio de sexo (8) Cambios (43) cambodia (3) Camilo Cienfuegos (6) Campesinos (25) Canada (478) Canada-China (3) canal de suez (2) Canarias (9) cancer (47) candada (1) Candidatos a la Presidencia (1) cannes (1) cantantes (9) cantantes cubanos (11) Caos (12) Capitalismo (8) Carceles (55) Carceles cubanas (110) Cardenal Bertone (2) Carl Sagan (1) Carlos Alberto Montaner (38) Carlos Marx (8) Carlos Otero (4) Carlos Saladrigas (10) carlos salim (1) carlos varela (2) Carmelo Mesa-Lago (7) Carnavales (1) Carne (1) carter (19) Casa Blanca (30) Casa de Fidel (15) casinos (2) caso uci (6) Castillo del Morro (1) Castrismo (418) Catastrofismo (13) Cato Institute (2) Causa 1 (6) Causas de su enfermedad (1) Cayo Coco (1) CEA (6) Ceasescu (5) Celac (21) Celebridades (180) celia cruz (1) Celia Hart (2) celulares (6) Celulas madres (4) Censura (27) Censura en internet (128) central nuclear (8) Centro de estudios de la inteligencia cubana (3) cerebro (41) certificado de nacimiento (13) chantaje (5) Chavez (507) chavismo (27) Che Guevara (58) Chechenia (9) Chelsea Clinton (1) Chernobil (18) Chile (61) China (433) China-Tibet (18) Chinos (2) Chipre (5) Chismes (1) Chivatos (7) chocolate (1) Choteo (5) Chris Simmons (50) Chuck Hagel (15) CIA (135) ciber espionaje (4) Ciberactivismo (13) Ciberataques (41) cibersecurity (16) Ciencia (49) ciencia-ficcion (1) Ciencias (282) Ciencias y Politica (19) cine (143) Cine Cubano (129) circulacion monetaria (2) Cirque du Soleil (1) ciudadanos (3) ciudades (9) Clase Media (2) Clases sociales (2) Claudia Cadelo (7) Clima (20) cnn (7) coalicion (5) Cobalto (1) coca (1) cocacola (2) Cocaina (6) cocina (1) colaboracionistas (19) Colaboradores y agentes en el exterior (261) Colaborares y agentes en el exterior (31) Colin Powel (3) Colombia (76) Combustibles (4) comercio (2) Comercio Exterior (21) comercio internacional (18) comercio sexual (5) Comida cubana (2) competitividad (6) complejidad (2) Computacion (30) computadoras (12) comunicacion (5) Comunismo (78) comunistas (43) conceptos (1) condicion humana (4) Condoleezza Rice (1) conducta humana (29) Conflicto (1) Conflicto Colombia-Venezuela (5) conflicto colombia-venezuela-ecuador (21) conflicto cuba-estados unidos (19) Congo (2) consecuencias (1) Consejo de Estado (3) Conservadores (11) Conspiracion (395) conspiranoia (35) constitucion (22) Construccion (37) consules cubano (1) Consumo (1) Contaminacion ambiental (49) Contrabando (5) Contrainteligencia (75) contrarrevolucion (1) contraterrorismo (3) Control de Armas (59) Control Social (25) cooperacion economica (1) cooperativas (6) Coraje (2) Corea (6) Corea del Norte (184) Corea del Norte-EEUU (31) Corea del Sur (37) Corporacion Cubana (1) corporaciones (7) Correa (21) Corrupcion (283) costa de marfil (5) costa de oro (1) Costa Rica (4) Costo de Vida (1) creatividad (3) Creditos (14) Crimenes (95) Criminales (24) Criminales en Cuba (14) Crisis (16) Crisis de Octubre (34) Crisis economica (148) Crisis financiera (270) Crisis mundial (36) crisis politica (6) Cristina Fernández de Kirchner (1) critica social (2) Criticas (1) croacia (2) Cruceros (4) Cub (2) Cuba (7140) Cuba - Remesas de dinero (22) Cuba Ante Todo (1) Cuba crisis (65) cuba economia (18) Cuba ideologia (5) Cuba Independiente (1) Cuba politica (8) Cuba turismo (125) Cuba-Agricultura (37) Cuba-Argentina (6) cuba-biotecnologia (4) cuba-brasil (44) Cuba-Canada (137) cuba-china (39) Cuba-Colombia (4) Cuba-Corea del Sur (2) Cuba-demografia (6) Cuba-Deportes (9) cuba-ecologia (15) Cuba-Economia (6) Cuba-Educacion (12) Cuba-empleo y desempleo (50) Cuba-España (168) Cuba-Estados Unidos (1206) Cuba-Estados Unidos-Canada (12) Cuba-Estados Unidos-Rusia (14) Cuba-Estados Unidos-Union Europea (5) cuba-estados unidos-union sovietica (10) Cuba-eta (7) Cuba-Etiopia (3) Cuba-Exportaciones (14) Cuba-Farc (5) Cuba-Google (4) cuba-holanda (3) Cuba-Ideologia (4) Cuba-India (5) cuba-inglaterra (8) Cuba-internet (70) Cuba-Iran (11) Cuba-Iso (1) Cuba-Medicina (41) Cuba-Medio Oriente (5) Cuba-Mexico (21) Cuba-narcotrafico (11) Cuba-Obama (9) cuba-onu (31) Cuba-Opinion publica (1) Cuba-Prensa-Ideologia (7) Cuba-Qatar (2) Cuba-reformas (28) Cuba-Rusia (43) Cuba-Rusia-Estados Unidos (8) Cuba-Rusia-Venezuela (3) Cuba-Sida (2) Cuba-sospechas y miedos (2) Cuba-terrorismo (25) Cuba-turismo (2) Cuba-Tv (2) Cuba-Union Europea (58) Cuba-Union Sovietica (3) Cuba-Union Sovietica-EEUU (1) Cuba-Uruguay (5) Cuba-Vaticano (89) Cuba-Venezuela (177) Cuba-venezuela-rusia (3) Cuba-violencia (2) Cuba-Yahoo (1) Cuba: Identidad nacional (4) cubadebate (3) Cubaencuentro (1) Cubalse (1) Cuban study group (4) cubana de aviacion (13) cubanalisis (30) Cubanicidios (1) cubano-americanos (8) Cubanologia (4) Cubanologos (39) Cubanos (15) cubanos en el mundo (50) CubaResponde (2) Cubq (1) CUC (6) cuentapropistas (74) Cuentas Nacionales (2) Culto a la personalidad (1) Cultura (26) Curiosidades (423) Cuva (1) Daguestan (1) dalai lama (13) dalia soto (2) damas de blanco (209) daniel ortega (4) Danza (7) Darsi Ferrer (4) Davos (2) debate de raul (2) Debate Politico (4) Deborah Castro Espin (1) Declaracion de Estados Unidos (3) Delfin (2) Delincuencia juvenil (1) demanda (1) Demandas populares (1) Democracia (137) Demografia (11) denuncia (1) Departamento de Estado (11) Deportacion (38) Deporte (145) deporte cubano (79) deporte profesional (2) deportistas cubanos (16) Derechos Humanos (384) Derribo de Avionetas (3) desalojos (2) desaparecidos (5) Desarrollo cientifico-tecnico (46) Desarrollo-Subdesarrollo (18) desastre ecologico (20) desastre nuclear (111) Desastres (31) Desastres naturales (111) Desde aqui (1) desempleo (25) deserciones (9) Deserciones de deportistas (73) desnudos (3) Desperanza (1) destierro (4) Destruccion (5) deuda (51) Deuda Exterior de Cuba (24) Deuda externa (8) DGI (193) Dialogo con Raul (1) Dialogo Nacional (1) Dialogo Politico (7) Dialogueros (6) diamantes (1) diana krall (1) Diaz-Balart (1) Dick Cheney (1) Dictadores (77) dictadura (13) Dictaduras (46) dilma rouseff (17) dinamarca (2) dinastias (1) dinero (18) Diosdado Cabello (20) diplomacia (13) diplomaticos cubanos (13) discapacitados (23) Discrepancias (1) Discriminacion (2) Disidencia (160) Disidentes (696) Distribucion (1) Divisas (4) Djibouti (1) Djokovic (1) doble moral (1) doctrina militar (2) Documental (92) Documental cubano (57) Dolar (9) Donaciones (15) donald trump (11) Dr. Antonio de la Cova (1) Dr. Biscet (14) Dr. Darsi Ferrer (19) Dr. Francia (2) Dra. Molina (6) drogas (61) dronenet (1) drones (51) Dualidad monetaria (3) dubai (1) dulce maria loynaz (2) Duque Hernandez (4) Dyron Robles (2) e (1) Ebay (5) ebooks (2) Ecologia (57) Economia (128) Economia Canadiense (11) Economia China (37) Economia Cubana (261) Economia mundial (66) Economist (1) Economistas cubanos (7) Ecuador (43) Educacion (29) EEUU (2) EEUU Congreso (123) EEUU desintegracion (2) EEUU Economia (58) EEUU Gobierno (46) EEUU senado (86) EEUU-China (29) EEUU-Mexico (11) efecto domino (2) efectos (1) Egipto (169) Einstein (5) ejecutivos (2) Ejercito (70) ejercito britanico (1) ejercito canadiense (5) ejercito cubano (39) Ejercito norteamericano (196) Ejercito norteamericano Iraq (7) Ejercito norteamericanoIslamismo (2) Ejercito Rebelde (6) ejercito ruso (2) ejercito venezolano (10) El caso Marquitos (1) El Chacal (3) El Coran (4) El Grupo de Raul (22) El Guaton (22) El Pais (3) El Papa (88) El Salvador (5) El Sexto (4) Elecciones (120) Elecciones en Cuba (60) elecciones en estdos unidos (3) Elecciones en EU (200) electronica (1) Elena Burke (1) Elian (8) Eliecer Avila (27) Elite (5) email (6) embajadas cubanas (1) Embargo (462) Emigracioin (20) Emigracion (67) Emigracion cubana (965) emigracion ilegal (15) Emigrantes ilegales (12) emilio ichikawa (101) EMP ha (1) Empleo (13) Emprendedores (13) empresarios (4) empresas (20) Empresas extranjeras en Cuba (5) Encuesta de opinion (18) Energia (32) energia electrica (22) Energia nuclear (62) energia termonuclear (1) Energias renovables (24) enfermedades (33) enfermos (3) Enjuiciamiento (1) Enrique Dans (1) Enrisco (13) Entrenamiento militar (1) entretenimiento (2) envejecimiento (3) envios a Cuba (1) epidemias (29) equality (1) Eric Holder (5) erick sanchez (2) erislandi lara (2) erislandy lara (6) Ernesto Diaz de Villegas (1) Ernesto Hernandez Busto (2) erotismo (18) escambray (2) escandalo (23) esclavitud (2) escocia (1) Escritores cubanos (72) escuadron patriota (7) escuelas (2) Eslovaquia (1) Espacio Laical (1) Espana (9) España (135) Especulacion (1) Espias (31) espias cubanos (62) Espias cubanos presos (110) Espinaxiones (23) Espionaje (71) espionaje industrial (9) estacion internacional (1) estadisticas (17) Estado (7) Estado de sitio (1) Estados Unidos (1298) estados unidos crisis (71) Estados Unidos economia (81) estados unidos gobierno (40) Estados Unidos-Canada (24) Estados Unidos-China (2) Estados Unidos-Rusia (33) estanflacion (1) Esteban Lazo (1) Esteban Morales Dominguez (4) estonia (1) estrategia (2) estrategia militar (2) estudiantes extranjeros (8) Estudios Cubanos (2) estulin (1) Estupideces (222) Eta (8) Etanol (4) Etica Politica (3) Etica y moral (7) Etnologia (2) EU (2) eu senado (2) Eugenio Yáñez (2) euro (4) Europa (62) Europa del Este (1) Eusebio Leal (9) eutanasia (2) Eva Braun (2) evacuacion (1) Evo Morales (30) evolucion (13) ex paises socialistas (1) excarcelados (1) Exilio (8) Exilio cubano (84) Exodo cubano (3) explosion nuclear (3) Explotacion del trabajo infantil (2) Exportaciones (10) expropiaciones (3) extranjeros (6) extrema derecha (5) extremistas (49) F1 (3) facebook (64) fallas de internet (8) Familia (18) familia cubana (5) Famosos (2) Far (25) Farc (79) fascismo (3) FBI (100) federico garcia lorca (1) Felicidad (4) Felix Bonne Csarcasses (1) Feria del Libro (1) ferry (1) Fertilizantes (1) Fidel (712) Fidel Castro (8) Fidel familia (37) Fidel reflexiones (4) Fidel-Estados Unidos (2) Fidelistas (1) Fidelito (6) fiji (1) filipinas (11) Filosofia (18) Finanzas (56) Finlandia (2) first nation (4) fisica (20) Fisin (1) FIU (1) flamur (3) Flash usb (1) flora (1) Florida (44) FMI (7) Fnca (6) Fondos de inversion (19) forbes (5) Foreign Policy blog (3) Formula 1 (1) Foros cubanos (1) Fortuna de Fidel y Raul (3) Fotografia (95) fran (1) Francia (45) Francis I (6) franco (1) Frank Delgado (1) François Hollande (1) Frases celebres (3) Fraude (84) fraude electoral (38) freddi roche (1) Friedrich Hayek (3) frontera (6) Fuerza de trabajo (18) fukushima (7) Fusilamientos (5) Futbol cubano (8) Futuro (21) G.W. Bush (8) G2 (7) G20 (2) G7 (1) g8 (3) Gabo (4) Gabriel Garcia Marquez (3) gaddafi (132) Gaesa (1) Galicia (2) Gallegos (1) Gamboa (19) Ganaderia (6) Ganado (2) Gangs (2) garry kasparov (1) Gas (9) Gasolina (8) gatos (1) Gays (44) gaza (1) gazapos (1) Geert Wilders (1) Gen. Petraeus (11) Gen. Rafael del Pino (2) gene sharp (3) Generacion Y (26) Generales (23) Generales cubanos (21) Genetica (25) genios (4) genocidio (1) Geoges Soros (14) Geometria Fractal (2) geopolitica (42) Geopolitica cubana (15) Geopolitica latinoamericana (25) george orwel (2) Georgia (8) Gerencia empresarial (3) Ghana (4) Giron (1) gitanos (2) glacier (1) glasnot (2) Glenn Beck (3) globalistas (3) Globalizacion (14) gmail (1) gobernabilidad (6) gobernantes (1) Gobierno cubano (10) Gobierno Mundial (10) Gobierno paralelo (2) gobiernos (17) golfo de mexico (2) Golpe de estado (10) google (46) Google glass (1) Gorbachov (22) Gorki (19) grammy (1) Granada (3) grandes ligas (24) Granma (63) grecia (26) greenpace (1) greenpeace (1) Groenlandia (5) Ground Zero (6) guama (20) Guanabo (2) Guantanamo (8) Guatemala (3) guerra (69) guerra asimetrica (5) guerra cibernetica (45) guerra civil (68) guerra comercial (2) Guerra de Angola (11) Guerra de E-mails (1) guerra espacial (1) Guerra Fria (31) Guerra hispano-americana (6) Guerra Irregular (2) guerra sicologica (2) Guerras (98) Guerras africanas (9) Guerrillas (28) Guillermo Cabrera Infante (7) Guillermo Farinas (64) guinness (6) gulag (1) haarp (4) Habana (1) Hackers (56) Hackers cubanos (3) Haiti (22) Hamas (26) Hambre (5) hambruna (3) Hamid Karzai (12) Haroldo (3) hawai (3) Hazanas (51) Heberto Padilla (8) Hector Lombard (7) hemingway (3) Henrique Capriles (16) henry kissinger (4) Herencia (2) Hermanos al Rescate (14) heroismo (2) Herta Müller (2) herzegovina (1) hesbollah (1) Hezbollah (11) Hialeah (4) Hidrologia (1) Hijos (4) hijos de puta (2) Hilda Molina (6) Hillary Clinton (67) hipotecas (7) hippies (2) hispanos (2) Historia (48) Historia de Cuba (30) Hitler (17) hizbollah (2) hobby (1) Holanda (5) hollywood (60) holografia (1) hombre (28) homeless (4) Homofobia (42) Homosexuales (20) Homosexualismo (20) Honduras (35) hopkins (2) hot line (1) huber matos (13) Hubert Matos (20) Huckabee (1) huelga de hambre (121) huelgas (1) humanismo (2) humanos (16) Humberto Fontova (8) Humidores (1) Humor (524) hungria (2) Huracanes (78) I GM (2) I-D (2) Iberoamerica (1) icaic (2) Ichikawa (2) Ideologia (11) Idiomas (2) Idiotas (15) Ig Nobel Prize (3) Iglesia (45) Iglesia cubana (197) II GM (13) III GM (1) iInestabilidad social (1) Ileana de la Guardia (1) Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (18) Ilegales (1) imperios (2) Importaciones (9) Impuestos (77) India (27) Indice de Desarrollo Humano (3) indigenas (7) Indigencia (2) indonesia (4) industria (4) Industria azucarera (29) industriales (2) Ineficiencia economica (1) Inestabilidad social (17) Infamia (6) inflacion (7) Informacion (12) informatica (17) Infraestructura (1) ingenieria social (2) Inglaterra (25) Ingrid Betacourt (7) Inmobiliarias (15) inmolacion (1) Inmovilismo raulista (3) innovaciones (15) Intelectuales (24) intelectuales y artistas cubanos (25) Inteligencia (42) inteligencia artificial (7) Inteligencia cubana (35) Internet (210) intervencion militar (44) Intolerancia (4) invasion (5) Inversion extranjera (306) Inversiones (40) investigaciones secretas (2) Ion Mihai Pacepa (1) ipad (5) iphone (2) Iran (179) iran-estados unidos (34) Iraq (51) irlanda (10) isaac asimov (2) Islam (92) Islamismo (144) islandia (4) islas caiman (2) Islas del Pacifico (2) Israel (137) Israel-EEUU (13) israel-palestina (1) Italia (36) Ivan de la Nuez (2) Ivan Pedroso (1) Izquierdas (16) J.E. Hoover (2) J.K. Rowling (1) jaime bayly (5) Jaime Ortega (39) Jaime Suchlicki (1) jamaica (2) Japon (162) japon terremotos (7) Jared Lee Loughner (1) jeb bush (5) jesse ventura (15) JFK (24) Jicotea cubana (1) jihad (12) jineterismo (27) Joaquin Sabinas (1) joe biden (13) Joel Casamayor (9) John A. Boehner (39) John Boehner (2) John Brennan (2) John Kerry (20) john lennon (5) Jon Stewart (3) jordania (5) Jorge Arreaza (1) jorge pomar (4) Jose Ariel Contreras (3) Jose Daniel Ferrer (2) jose lezama lima (2) jose marti (2) Jose Mujica (1) Jose Ramon Machado Ventura (10) Juan Abreu (19) Juan F. Benemelis (7) Juan Juan (24) Juan Manuel Marquez (2) Juan Triana (1) jubilados (1) judios (19) Juegos (12) Juegos Olimpicos (16) Julian Assange (28) Julio Casas Regueiro (2) justicia (2) Justin Bieber (2) Justin Trudeau (1) Justin Truedeau (1) Juventud (26) Juventud Cubana (43) Juventud Rebelde (5) kamikazes (1) Kaos (8) kAOS en la red (28) karadzic (1) karzai (2) kazajastan (3) Kcho (1) kendry morales (3) Kennedy (38) Kenya (3) Keynesianismo (3) KGB (10) Khamenei (2) Kid Chocolate (1) Kim Jong Il (17) kim jong-un (29) kirchner (1) kirguizia (2) Kirguizistan (2) Kitchner (5) klitshko (9) Kosovo (3) kuwait (3) La Habana (14) lady gaga (4) Laetitia Casta (1) Lage (21) Lance Armstrong (13) laser (1) Latinoamerica (85) laura pollan (29) lavado de dinero (14) Laz (2) Lazaro Barredo (2) Lazaro Gonzalez (1) leche (1) lefties (20) Leftist (2) leftists (60) leinier (1) Lenguaje (5) lenin (4) leo brouwer (1) Leonard Cohen (2) leonardo da vinci (2) Leonardo Padura (7) Ley de Ajuste Cubana (13) Leyes (55) Leyes cubanas (28) Lezama Lima (2) lgbt (7) libano (5) Liberacion (1) Liberales (7) Liberalismo (10) Libertad (23) Libertad de expresion (36) libertad de informacion (12) Libia (346) Libre Expresion (1) Libreta de Abastecimientos (6) Libros (13) Lina Ruz (1) Literatura (29) Literatura Cubana (39) Lituania (1) Liu Xiaobo (9) livan hernandez (8) Lluvia (1) Logica Difusa (2) logistica (2) Long tail (1) Los Aldeanos (19) Los Duros (2) Los Miquis (4) loteria (16) Lucha no violenta activa (17) Ludwing von Mises (2) luis alberto garcia (1) Luis Alberto Rodriquez (4) Lula (41) lulzsec (1) Luna (2) Machado Ventura (19) Machu Picchu (1) Macroeconomia (8) madres (7) Mafia (18) Mafia cubana (3) Mahmoud Abbas (1) mahoma (1) malasia (4) malcom x (1) Maleconazo (11) mali (1) Malta (2) Malvinas (2) Mambises (3) Mandela (4) Manipulacion (455) manny pacquiao (17) Manuel Diaz Martinez (2) Manuel Vazquez Portal (4) Mao Tse Tung (8) Mapas (5) Maquiavelo (1) mar (18) Maradona (3) marcas (3) marco rubio (68) marcos rubio (3) maremotos (9) margaret thatcher (6) Marginalidad (11) maria elvira (3) Mariel (8) Mariela Castro (84) Marifelli Perez-Stable (8) marihuana (8) marilyn monroe (7) Marino Murillo (1) Mario Chanes de Armas (1) Mario Vargas Llosa (5) Mark Zuckerberg (6) Marketing (9) Marquitos (1) marta fonseca (1) marte (10) Martha Beatriz Roque (47) Martha Colmenares (16) Marti (5) martin luther king (3) Marulanda (7) Marx (1) Marxismo (13) Masacre del remolcador 13 de marzo (4) masas (1) mashable (1) masoneria (2) mass killers (25) matematicas (4) material nuclear (5) Materias primas (5) Mauritania (1) max lesnik (3) Max Marambio (29) mayweather (10) Mazorra (1) McCain (12) media (65) Mediacion (2) Medicare (1) Medicina (96) medicinas (17) Medicos cubanos (39) Medio ambiente (23) Medio Oriente (78) medio oriente crisis (3) Medios de comunicion (90) Medvedev (19) Mercado (13) Mercado informal (5) Mercado Inmobiliario (24) Mercado InmobiliarioR (1) mercado mayorista (2) mercado minorista (1) Mercados Agropecuarios (21) mercados emergentes (2) Mercosur (1) meryl streep (1) Mesa Redonda (5) meteoritos (14) Mexico (48) mi5 (1) Miami (263) michael jackson (4) Michael Moore (9) Michel Foucault (3) michelle obama (13) Microcreditos (10) microeconomia (1) Microsiervos (4) Microsoft (8) miedos (3) Migracion (3) Miguel Barnet (1) Miguel Diaz-Canel (17) mike porcel (1) Mike Tyson (5) Militares (29) militares cubanos (19) militares venezolanos (3) Militarismo (17) milton friedman (1) minas (4) minerales (21) Minint (17) minorias (2) Miriam Celaya (1) miseria (38) Misterios (17) Mitt Romney (36) MMA (100) moda (7) Modelo chino (8) modelos economicos (1) Mohammed Morsi (12) momias (1) Monarquias (6) moneda (11) moneda virtual (2) mongolia (2) Montaner (7) montreal (1) Movilizacion contra Castro (1) Movimiento 26 de Julio (1) Mozambique (1) Mubarak (9) muerte (12) Muertes del Castrismo (155) Muertos de la Revolucion (9) Mugabe (8) Muhammad Ali (3) Mujeres (114) Mujeres cubanas (44) mulsumanes (7) multiculturalismo (9) Mundo (1055) Muro de Berlin (14) Musica (154) Musica Cubana (214) Musica-tecnologia (2) Musicos cubanos (172) Musicos ubanos (1) muslims brotherhood (54) mussolini (1) Musulmanes (204) myanmar (6) nacion (1) Nacionalismo (1) Nadal (3) namibia (4) nanomedicina (1) nanotecnologias (10) Napoleon (2) narcoguerrilla (14) Narcotrafico (46) Nasa (56) naturaleza (18) navy seal (2) nazismo (16) Negociacion politica (78) negocios (39) negros (5) Neocastrismo (381) neocons (8) neonazis (2) nepal (9) Nepotismo (6) nerd (1) Neruda (2) Network (1) neutralidad (1) New York (19) New York Times (5) Newsweek (1) Niagara Falls (2) nicaragua (17) Nicolas Maduro (61) nigeria (1) Nikita Jrushchov (2) ninos (140) Niquel (15) nivel de vida (5) Noam Chomsky (1) nomeklatura (6) nomekltarua (3) nomen (1) Nomenklatura (349) Norberto Fuentes (10) Norteamerica (3) norteamericanos (3) noruega (13) Nostradamus (1) Noticias (7) nudismo (2) nueva zelandia (12) Nuevo Herald (5) Obama (19) Obama's Group (3) Obamacare (6) Obamunismo (1) Occidente (40) occupy movement (15) Ochoa (13) Odalanier Solis (7) Odio (3) odlanier solis (10) OEA (24) Ofensiva revolucionaria (1) Oferta y demanda (6) oil sands (2) Olimpiadas (1) Oliver Stone (1) ollanta humala (3) Olof Palme (1) OLPL (14) ontario (19) Ontologia (3) ONU (51) Operacion Caguairan (2) Opiniones (3) Opositores (519) opostiores (11) Orestes Lorenzo (1) Organizaciones politicas del exilio (57) organs trade (1) Orlando Zapata Tamayo (81) orlov (7) osama bin laden (77) oscar de la hoya (1) Oscar Elias Biscet (20) Oscar Espinosa Chepe (15) Oscar Haza (5) Otan (54) OTZ (1) ovnis (11) OWS (33) OZT (55) Pablo Escobar Gavirias (6) Pablo Milanes (21) Paises emisores de turismo (26) Pakistan (42) paladares (3) Palestina (64) Panama (6) pancho cespedes (2) Panfilo (4) papua (1) paquistan (1) paquito D'rivera (5) paradigmas (5) paraguay (5) paraguay. Cuba (2) Paramilitares (3) paranormal (1) Parche (1) Paris Hilton (1) parlamento (5) Partido Comunisa de Cuba (41) partido comunista (32) Partido Comunista de Cuba (6) Partido Democrata (78) Partido politicos (49) Partido Republicano (89) Partido Socialista Unido Venezolano (1) partidos politicos (11) pastor terry jones (1) Patricio de la Guardia (2) patriotismo (1) paul krugman (15) Paul Ryan (2) Pavonato (1) Paya (92) paypal (1) paywall (1) Paz (5) PCC (10) PDVAL (1) PDVSA (12) peacemakers (1) Pederastia (1) Pedofilia (3) pedolfilia (1) pedro campos (3) Pedro Diaz Lanz (5) Pedro Luis Boitel (5) Pedro Luis Diaz Lanz (1) Pedro Luis Ferrer (5) pedro pablo oliva (2) Pelota (46) Pelota cubana (214) Peloteros cubanos en grandes ligas (131) Pena de muerte (2) Pensadores cubanos (5) Pensamiento politico (2) pensiones (3) Pentagono (73) Penultimos Dias (3) pequenos negocios (2) percepcion (1) Perdon (2) Perez Roque (10) Perfil de Raul (2) Periodismo (9) periodistas (14) Periodistas cubanos (10) periodistas independientes (23) Peronismo (1) Persona del ano (1) personalidades (23) Peru (11) perugorria (1) Peso cubano (3) PETA (1) Petrocasas (3) Petroleo (170) Petroleo cubano (184) PIB [GDP] (1) picasso (1) Piedad Cordova (1) pinochet (1) pinttura (3) Pintura Cubana (21) piratas (6) Plan de Raul (2) planificacion (2) Playa Giron (21) playas (4) Plaza Tiannamen (7) po0 (1) poblacion (52) Poblacion y dinero (23) Pobreza (183) poder (5) Poder Politico (123) Poder politico en Cuba (29) Poder Popular (9) Poesia (12) Poker (1) Polemica (5) Policia (47) Politica (60) politica exterior (7) politica fiscal (1) Politica internacional (4) Politica Monetaria (2) Politica norteamericana hacia Cuba (1) Political correctness (6) politicamente correcto (2) politicos (61) polonia (8) Polucion (1) ponzi scheme (3) popularidad (1) Populismo (9) Porno (5) Porno para Ricardo (18) pornografia (4) Portugal (10) posada carriles (2) posicion comun (4) post Fidel (4) Post-castrismo (2) Post-fidelismo (2) Postcastrismo (4) Postcastro (1) Postcomunismo (1) PostFidel (2) Postfidelismo (13) Precios (20) Precios en el mercado informal (2) predicciones (6) premio (7) Premio 11 de Abril (2) Premio al Buen Corazon (1) Premio Blog Acido (1) Premio Blog Desmentido (1) Premio Blog Dorado (2) Premio Eta Kanpora (1) Premio Huella 2008 (5) Premio Nobel (26) Premio Nobel de Economia (1) premio nobel de la paz (6) Premio Nobel de Literatura (2) Premio Ortega y Gasset (3) Premio Sajarov (2) Premio San Miguel Arcangel (1) Premios (11) Premios 11 de Abril (1) Prensa (34) prensa cubana (33) Prensa Extranjera (39) Presidente de Cuba (1) Presidio Politico (34) Presos (46) Presos de conciencia (72) presos politicos (41) Presupuesto (100) pride (2) Primavera Negra (75) prisioneros (5) Prisioneros de conciencia (51) Prisioneros de concienciencia (1) privacidad (26) productividad (2) Producto Interno de Cuba (1) profecias (5) Programa politico (8) Progreso (1) Prohibiciones (1) pronosticos (8) Propaganda (201) Propiedad (2) Propiedad intelectual (1) Propiedad privada (2) proselitismo (2) Prostitucion (60) Protesta (15) Protestas (452) provocacion (6) Proyecto Varela (6) PSUV (1) publicidad (1) Pueblo (5) Punto 0-0 (1) puppets (1) Putin (86) Pymes (25) Qatar (5) Quebec (3) Quejas de la poblacion (3) Queubec (1) Quinquenio Gris (1) Racionamiento (3) Racismo (42) radio frequency wapons (1) Radio Marti (11) radioactividad (31) Rafael Alejandro Hernandez Real (1) Rafael Correa (7) rafael rojas (3) rahm emanuel (3) ramadan (1) Ramiro (18) randy alonso (3) Raul (480) Raul Castro (12) raul familia (5) Raul Reyes (16) Raul Rivero (6) Raul y Fidel Castro (1) Raulismo (16) Razas en Cuba (1) RDA (10) Real politik (1) rebeldes (54) rebelion (1) reciclaje (1) reconciliacion nacional (1) Reconstruccion (1) Recrutamiento de agentes (8) Red Avispa (51) Redes sociales (32) Reflexiones (4) reforma en cuba (200) reforma migratoria (78) Reforma Monetaria (18) Reforma politica (4) Reformas (84) Reformas economicas (299) Reformas economicas. (1) Reformas raulistas (138) Refugiados (3) Regionalismo (1) Reina Tamayo (28) reinaldo arenas (5) Reinaldo Escobar (21) reino unido (83) Relaciones Cuba-Estados Unidos (5) Relaciones Internacionales (2) Relevo generacional (4) Religion (148) religiones afrocubanas (26) Remolcador (6) Renuncia (2) Renuncia de Fidel (1) rep checa (1) Reporteros sin Fronteras (5) Represioin (33) Represion (1086) Represion a los intelectuales (71) Repsol (15) Republica Checa (4) Republica Dominicana (6) resistencia popular (1) reunificacion (1) reunificacion familiar (4) revolucion (7) revolucion arabe (5) revolucion cubana (25) Revolucionarios (1) reynier aguero (1) richard branson (5) Richard Nixon (4) ricos (18) riesgo (1) rigondeaux (17) Riqueza (11) robert kennedy (1) robertico robaina (2) Robots (28) rockets (17) Roger Federer (2) ron cubano (7) ronald reagan (10) Rosa Diez (1) Rosa María Payá (24) Rosita Fornes (2) Ruinas (1) Rumania (15) rumanos (1) Rumores (3) rupert murdoch (1) Rusia (309) sahara occidental (1) Salarios (12) Salman Rushdie (1) Salud (295) salud cubana (49) Salud de Fidel (60) Salud de Raul (2) Salud publica (211) Sandinistas (1) santiago de cuba (1) Sarah Palin (14) sarajevo (1) satelite (8) Sats. Cuba (26) Scarabeo 9 (6) secret service (3) Secretario de Defensa (2) Secretario de Estado (1) Secreto (9) secretos militares (8) Secuestrados (18) Secuestros (31) securidad del estado (1) Seguridad (31) seguridad cubana (14) Seguridad del Estado (49) Seguridad nacional (57) seguridad personal (6) seguridad social (2) Seguros (2) Selman (2) Semiotica (2) senadores (22) serbia (3) Sergio Ramirez (1) sexo (48) Sharia (13) Sherrit (18) siberia (2) Sicilia (1) Sicologia (28) Sicologia politica (7) Sida (7) Silvio Benitez (20) Silvio Rodriquez (27) silvito el libre (2) Simon Bolivar (3) sina (16) Sindicatos (23) Sindrome del Neocastrismo (37) Singapur (1) siquiatria (8) Siria (77) smartphone (3) sms (1) Soberania (1) Social (1) social media (4) social network (1) Socialdemocracia (4) Socialismo (51) socialismo de mercado (3) Socialismo del Siglo XXI (9) socialistas (30) Sociedad (69) Sociedad Civil (22) Sociedades Secretas (1) Sociologia (22) sofia loren (1) software (1) sol (10) soldados (18) Solidaridad (7) Solzhenitsyn (2) Somalia (13) Sonia Garro (2) Soros (1) sri lanka (1) st.piere (1) st.pierre (1) Stalin (18) Stephen Hawking (10) steve jobs (12) stock market (5) stratfor (3) Subastas (10) submarinos (1) Subversion (3) Sucesion (152) Sucesores (91) Sucre (3) Sudafrica (18) Sudal del Sur (1) Sudan (3) suecia (14) Suelos (1) suerte (8) suicidio (12) suiza (5) sundance (2) Susan Boyle (1) Susan Rice (1) Swat team (1) Tabaco Cubano (26) tabacos cubanos (2) Tabu (1) tailandia (3) taiwan (9) Taladrid (1) talento (2) Taliban (58) Tania Bruguera (1) Tarata (1) task force (1) tattoo (4) taxpayers (1) Tea Party (11) Teatro cubano (6) tecnologia (138) ted cruz (4) ted kennedy (1) Telecomunicaciones (43) Television (8) Tenis (7) Teoria Economica (49) Teoria Politica (34) Terremotos (25) terromotos (2) Terrorismo (412) terroristas (316) terry fox (1) Terry Jones (2) Texas (3) thailandia (3) the beatles (6) thi (1) Think Tank (268) Tibet (20) tiburones (4) Tierra (40) Times (6) timor oriental (1) Tina Turner (1) Tiro fijo (2) tolerancia (1) tomas piard (2) tony blair (2) tony castro (11) Tony Cortes (4) Tony de la Guardia (7) Toronto (71) Torturas (15) Totalitarismo (14) trabajadores por cuenta propia (28) trabajos (8) Tracey Eaton (25) trafico de armas (12) Trafico de drogas (67) trafico de organos (1) trafico de personas (5) tragedias (2) Transicion (141) Transporte (14) Trasvestismo (4) Tratado de Libre Comercio (1) travesti (1) tren (8) tribunal internacional (1) Trilateral (2) trinida y tobago (1) trudeau (1) Tsunami (8) tunez (15) Tupamaro (1) Turismo (22) Turismo Cuba (56) Turquia (17) TV cubana (5) Tv Marti (8) twiter (5) Twitter (37) tycoon (5) UCI (12) Ucrania (20) UFC (36) ufo (6) uigur (1) UJC (10) Umap (7) Underground (1) Uneac (28) Uneac. Censura (5) UNESCO (1) Unidad politica (2) union (1) Union Europea (86) Union Sovietica (100) Universidad (58) Universo (59) Univision (1) Upec (3) uranio (3) Uribe (1) Uruguay (11) US Grants (2) US Presidentes (35) uzbekistan (1) Vacilon (1) vaclav havel (3) Valores y normas de conductas (6) Van Van (3) Vaticano (54) Vejez (3) Venezuela (380) Venezuela elecciones (48) venezuela-china (3) Venezuela-Cuba-Rusia-China-Iran (1) Venezuela-Estados Unidos (14) Venezuela-Rusia (3) Ventas (1) VI Congreso del PCC (46) Via China (3) Viajes a Cuba (103) vicente botin (1) victimas del 911 (7) victor mesa (1) Vida (27) vida extraterrestre (18) Vida Guerra (1) Video (28) video juegos (6) viejos (4) Viet Nam (18) Violencia (14) Virgen del Cobre (4) virtual (1) Virus (9) Vivienda (122) Vladimiro Roca (13) Voces del Barrio (8) volcanes (8) Walesa (7) wall street (30) walmart (4) Welfare (3) Wendy Guerra (4) whistleblowers (1) wi-fi (2) WikiLeaks (134) wikipedia (3) william levy (1) Willy Chirno (6) Wilman Villar Mendoza (25) Wilmar Villar Mendoza (1) windows (1) winston churchill (1) World Trade Center (17) World Trade Organization (1) wynoma ryder (1) Xi Jinping (3) xiomara laugart (4) XXX (1) yahoo (2) yasser arafat (5) Yeltsin (4) yemen (36) Yo acuso al gobierno cubano (1) Yoani (259) Yoany (19) Yoenis Cespedes (7) yoga (5) Yohandry (6) yoko ono (1) Youtube (15) yuan (5) yuri gagarin (3) Zawahri (1) zelaya (1) Zimbawe (8) Zoe Valdes (21) Zona Franca Mariel (3) Zumbado (1)

La columna de Cubanalisis

NEOCASTRISMO [Hacer click en la imagen]

NEOCASTRISMO [Hacer click en la imagen]
¨Saturno jugando con sus hijos¨/ Pedro Pablo Oliva

Seguidores

Carta desde la carcel de Fidel Castro Ruz

“…después de todo, para mí la cárcel es un buen descanso, que sólo tiene de malo el que es obligatorio. Leo mucho y estudio mucho. Parece increíble, las horas pasan como si fuesen minutos y yo, que soy de temperamento intranquilo, me paso el día leyendo, apenas sin moverme para nada. La correspondencia llega normalmente…”

“…Como soy cocinero, de vez en cuando me entretengo preparando algún pisto. Hace poco me mandó mi hermana desde Oriente un pequeño jamón y preparé un bisté con jalea de guayaba. También preparo spaghettis de vez en cuando, de distintas formas, inventadas todas por mí; o bien tortilla de queso. ¡Ah! ¡Qué bien me quedan! por supuesto, que el repertorio no se queda ahí. Cuelo también café que me queda muy sabroso”.
“…En cuanto a fumar, en estos días pasados he estado rico: una caja de tabacos H. Upman del doctor Miró Cardona, dos cajas muy buenas de mi hermano Ramón….”.
“Me voy a cenar: spaghettis con calamares, bombones italianos de postre, café acabadito de colar y después un H. Upman #4. ¿No me envidias?”.
“…Me cuidan, me cuidan un poquito entre todos. No le hacen caso a uno, siempre estoy peleando para que no me manden nada. Cuando cojo el sol por la mañana en shorts y siento el aire de mar, me parece que estoy en una playa… ¡Me van a hacer creer que estoy de vacaciones! ¿Qué diría Carlos Marx de semejantes revolucionarios?”.
¨La patria es dicha de todos, y dolor de todos, y cielo para todos, y no feudo ni capellaní­a de nadie¨ - Marti

"No temas ni a la prision, ni a la pobreza, ni a la muerte. Teme al miedo"
-
Giacomo Leopardi

¨Por eso es muy importante, Vicky, hijo mío, que recuerdes siempre para qué sirve la cabeza: para atravesar paredes¨Halvar de Flake [El vikingo]

"Como no me he preocupado de nacer, no me preocupo de morir" - Lorca

"Al final, no os preguntarán qué habéis sabido, sino qué habéis hecho" - Jean de Gerson

"Si queremos que todo siga como está, es necesario que todo cambie" - Giuseppe Tomasi di Lampedusa

"Todo hombre paga su grandeza con muchas pequeñeces, su victoria con muchas derrotas, su riqueza con múltiples quiebras" - Giovanni Papini


"Life is what happens while you are busy making other plans" - John Lennon

"Habla bajo, lleva siempre un gran palo y llegarás lejos" - Proverbio Africano

"No hay medicina para el miedo" - Proverbio escoces

"El supremo arte de la guerra es doblegar al enemigo sin luchar"
- Sun Tzu

"You do not really understand something unless you can explain it to your grandmother" - Albert Einstein

"It is inaccurate to say I hate everything. I am strongly in favor of common sense, common honesty, and common decency. This makes me forever ineligible for public office" - H. L. Menken

"I swore never to be silent whenever and wherever human beings endure suffering and humiliation. We must always take sides. Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented" - Elie Wiesel

"Stay hungry, stay foolish" -
Steve Jobs

"If you put the federal government in charge of the Sahara Desert , in five years ther'ed be a shortage of sand" - Milton Friedman

"The tragedy of modern man is not that he knows less and less about the meaning of his own life, but that it bothers him less and less" - Vaclav Havel

"No se puede controlar el resultado, pero si lo que uno haga para alcanzarlo" -
Vitor Belfort [MMA Fighter]

Liborio

Liborio
A la puerta de la gloria está San Pedro sentado y ve llegar a su lado a un hombre de cierta historia. No consigue hacer memoria y le pregunta con celo: ¿Quién eras allá en el suelo? Era Liborio mi nombre. Has sufrido mucho, hombre, entra, te has ganado el cielo.

Para Raul Castro

Cuba ocupa el penultimo lugar en el mundo en libertad economica solo superada por Corea del Norte.

Cuba ocupa el lugar 147 entre 153 paises evaluados en "Democracia, Mercado y Transparencia 2007"

Cuando vinieron

Cuando vinieron a buscar a los comunistas, Callé: yo no soy comunista.
Cuando vinieron a buscar a los sindicalistas, Callé: yo no soy sindicalista.
Cuando vinieron a buscar a los judíos, Callé: yo no soy judío. Cuando vinieron a buscar a los católicos, Callé: yo no soy “tan católico”.
Cuando vinieron a buscarme a mí, Callé: no había quien me escuchara.

Reverendo Martin Niemöller

Martha Colmenares

Martha Colmenares
Un sitio donde los hechos y sus huellas nos conmueven o cautivan

CUBA LLORA Y EL MUNDO Y NOSOTROS NO ESCUCHAMOS

Donde esta el Mundo, donde los Democratas, donde los Liberales? El pueblo de Cuba llora y nadie escucha.
Donde estan los Green, los Socialdemocratas, los Ricos y los Pobres, los Con Voz y Sin Voz? Cuba llora y nadie escucha.
Donde estan el Jet Set, los Reyes y Principes, Patricios y Plebeyos? Cuba desesperada clama por solidaridad.
Donde Bob Dylan, donde Martin Luther King, donde Hollywood y sus estrellas? Donde la Middle Class democrata y conservadora, o acaso tambien liberal a ratos? Y Gandhi? Y el Dios de Todos?
Donde los Santos y Virgenes; los Dioses de Cristianos, Protestantes, Musulmanes, Budistas, Testigos de Jehova y Adventistas del Septimo Dia. Donde estan Ochun y todas las deidades del Panteon Yoruba que no acuden a nuestro llanto? Donde Juan Pablo II que no exige mas que Cuba se abra al Mundo y que el Mundo se abra a Cuba?
Que hacen ahora mismo Alberto de Monaco y el Principe Felipe que no los escuchamos? Donde Madonna, donde Angelina Jolie y sus adoptados around de world; o nos hara falta un Brando erguido en un Oscar por Cuba? Donde Sean Penn?
Donde esta la Aristocracia Obrera y los Obreros menos Aristocraticos, donde los Working Class que no estan junto a un pueblo que lanquidece, sufre y llora por la ignominia?
Que hacen ahora mismo Zapatero y Rajoy que no los escuchamos, y Harper y Dion, e Hillary y Obama; donde McCain que no los escuchamos? Y los muertos? Y los que estan muriendo? Y los que van a morir? Y los que se lanzan desesperados al mar?
Donde estan el minero cantabrico o el pescador de percebes gijonese? Los Canarios donde estan? A los africanos no los oimos, y a los australianos con su acento de hombres duros tampoco. Y aquellos chinos milenarios de Canton que fundaron raices eternas en la Isla? Y que de la Queen Elizabeth y los Lords y Gentlemen? Que hace ahora mismo el combativo Principe Harry que no lo escuchamos?
Donde los Rockefellers? Donde los Duponts? Donde Kate Moss? Donde el Presidente de la ONU? Y Solana donde esta? Y los Generales y Doctores? Y los Lam y los Fabelo, y los Sivio y los Fito Paez?
Y que de Canseco y Miñoso? Y de los veteranos de Bahia de Cochinos y de los balseros y de los recien llegados? Y Carlos Otero y Susana Perez? Y el Bola, y Pancho Cespedes? Y YO y TU?
Y todos nosotros que estamos aqui y alla rumiando frustaciones y resquemores, envidias y sinsabores; autoelogios y nostalgias, en tanto Louis Michel comulga con Perez Roque mientras Biscet y una NACION lanquidecen?
Donde Maceo, donde Marti; donde aquel Villena con su carga para matar bribones?
Cuba llora y clama y el Mundo NO ESCUCHA!!!

Suscribirse Cuba Independiente

CIF: Cuba Independiente http://CubaIndependiente.blogspot.com Registro (c) Copyright: ® DIN 189297780000 Gerente By: www.copyrightwww.com