What is Conflict?
To answer this question, let's start with a theory of conflict developed by the late great John Boyd, America's best military thinker. It's a bit of a journey, but trust me, it's worth the effort.
Boyd's theory is based on the assumption that all conflict can be reduced to a contest of minds. Mind vs. Mind. It doesn't matter whether a conflict is person vs. person or army vs. army or corporation vs. corporation (i.e. Toyota vs. GM). It doesn't matter what the weapons or technology used in the conflict are. It doesn't matter where the conflict takes place. For Boyd, all conflict boils down to a contest of one mind against another (Sun Tzu implies the same thing).
So far, so good. Let's dig a little deeper.
- Question: how does a mind "fight"? Boyd concluded that a mind fights by adapting.
- This leads us to a Better Question: how do we adapt?
- Answer: by making decisions. The better/faster our decisions the greater our chances of success/survival.
- Observe: Gather data. What's changed? Objectivity is paramount.
- Orient: Make sense of this data. Reference all experience/insight. What does this observation mean?
- Decide: What should be done. Given what has changed, what should be done next.
- Act: Make the decision real.
I'm Inside Your OODA Loop
How does all of this apply to conflict? The simple answer is that conflict, in its most basic form, is a contest between decision making loops. The side with the FASTER and BETTER decision making loop wins any conflict. Why? They adapt quicker. Here's some more detail:
A FASTER decision making loop means that you accomplish a successful OODA loop quicker than an opponent. If you can do this, you are inside your opponent's OODA loop. This means that by the time your opponent responds to your last actions, you are already onto your next ones. Get far enough ahead and the opponent's decision making process will collapse and victory is assured.
A BETTER decision making loop means that the process you use to make decisions is better than your opponents. How to make a decision making loop better and how to damage your opponents decision making process is complex. It can lead to endless debates and theory crafting. The easiest way to look at it is as a function of connectivity (mental, physical, and moral). More connectivity typically means better decisions, less/corrupted connectivity means worse.