Since General Raul Castro became dictator-in-chief, the Cuban regime has
dramatically increased repression against its own people, taken an
American hostage and consummated the subversion of democracy
in Venezuela.
Despite this, the Obama Administration has continued to "extend its hand" and unilaterally ease sanctions (twice).
Now, the Castro regime has been caught red-handed smuggling illegal weaponry to North Korea.
So what will be the U.S. response?
According to the State Department (below), the U.S. will take "appropriate action," but stressed this is a U.N. Security Council issue.
In other words, the U.S. will consider outsourcing its decision to Russia (a veto-wielding member of the U.N. Security Council).
While we are at it -- why not let the U.N. Security Council decide how to deal with Russia's illegal actions in Ukraine as well?
Probably not a good idea.
To
recap, this is the first time any country in the Western Hemisphere has
been found in violation of an international arms embargo.
Moreover, it's the most egregious violation of North Korea sanctions -- by any country -- to date.
And yet, the U.S. is going to let Russia decide (which has a military spy ship
docked in Havana harbor) how to deal with Castro's regime?
Let's hope not.
Or Castro will be laughing with his friend Assad.
Click here to see details of the U.N. Panel of Experts report on Cuba's weapons smuggling to North Korea.
UN: Cuba would not ID those responsible for North Korea arms shipment
Cuba's
government refused to identify the people or entities involved in a
weapons shipment to North Korea last year that violated a U.N. arms
embargo, and might have violated the embargo twice more in 2012,
according to a U.N. report made public Tuesday.
Some of the
weapons and equipment that Cuba described as "obsolete" had been
calibrated just before they were put aboard the freighter Chong Chon
Gang, the document added, and Cuban insignias on two MiG21 warplanes
were painted over.
The report also declared that the shipment
intercepted in Panama violated the U.N. embargo on the Asian nation, and
that despite Havana's denials there were indications Cuba intended to
turn over the weapons to the Pyongyang government.
Cuba's 240-ton
shipment was "the largest amount of arms and related materiel"
interdicted going to or from North Korea since the Asian nation was hit
with an arms embargo in 2006 because of its nuclear weapons program, the
document added.
The public part of the 127-page report makes no
recommendations on sanctions for Cuban or North Korean entities involved
in the violations. But it mentions a secret annex submitted to the U.N.
Security Council, or UNSC, committee in charge of banking and travel
sanctions on violators.
The U.S. State Department said it will
“pursue appropriate action” based on the report but added, “We do not
view this as a bilateral issue between the United States and Cuba. This
is about a potential violation of U.N. Security Council sanctions on
North Korea.”
Anti-Castro activist Mauricio Claver Carone urged
the Obama administration to adopt "tangible repercussions that would
make it unequivocally clear to the Castro regime that such behavior
isn't inconsequential. Otherwise, it will continue to feel emboldened."
Cuba
declared in July that it sent the weapons to North Korea to be repaired
and returned. It later argued to U.N. investigators who visited Havana
that they did not violate the U.N. ban on the "supply, sale or transfer"
of weapons to Pyongyang because Cuba retained ownership and the embargo
covers "maintenance" but not "repairs."
Those arguments were
rejected in the document Tuesday, the annual report by the panel of U.N.
experts that investigates all violations of the North Korea sanctions.
It was submitted last month to the UNSC committee that enforces the
embargo, and parts of it had leaked to the news media.
"The Panel
is unconvinced by Cuba's rationale to distinguish 'maintenance' and
'repair,'" the report said, adding flatly that the shipment "violated
the sanctions."
Although Cuba told the U.N. investigators that
the state-run Cubazucar had shipped the 200,018 sacks of sugar that
covered and hid the weapons on the Chong Chon Gang, it refused to
identify the Cubans involved in the weapons shipment and contract with
Pyongyang.
"It declined ... to give the panel copies of these
agreements, citing confidentiality clauses in the contracts," the report
said. "The Panel is not, therefore, able to identify the entities or
individuals involved in these agreements."
The report said the
weapons were loaded aboard the freighter at the port of Mariel west of
Havana that's being expanded by a consortium of Almacenes Universal
S.A., run by the Cuban military and Brazilian enterprises.
Packed
in 25 metal shipping containers and six trailers were two anti-aircraft
missile systems, two MiG-21UM jet trainers, 15 engines and afterburners
for the MiG21s, artillery shells and other munitions and materiel -
most of it from the Soviet era.
While Cuba claims the weaponry
was to be returned to the island, the report said it was the "panel's
view that examining individually the items and their (packaging) ...
suggest that some, if not all, of the consignment was not expected to be
returned to Cuba."
And although Cuba claims the weapons were
"obsolete," the report added, "records accompanying a great deal of the
equipment indicated or certified the equipment functioned in accordance
with specification or had been calibrated just before packing. Further,
some of the equipment was unused or still in its original packaging."
What's
more, the report said, Cuba had confirmed that North Korean military
officers visited the island in 2012 to assess the weapons that were
shipped in 2013. If the visit was "to provide services or assistance ...
they would also have been a violation."
The report added that
another North Korean freighter docked in April 2012 at some of the same
Cuban ports as the Chong Chon Gang. Havana claimed it made only one
weapons shipment last summer, but the experts could not confirm that
claim.
The report also detailed the efforts to hide the Cuban
weapons under the sugar and the freighter's failure to report its true
cargo as it prepared to cross the Panama Canal westbound to North Korea.
Panama intercepted the ship on a tip it was carrying drugs.
Cuba argued that it was not responsible for hiding the weapons under the sugar, according to the U.N. experts' report.
The
document included the text of a message, marked "secret," notifying the
captain of the freighter that he would be taking on some unscheduled
cargo in Cuba and telling him to inform only his deputy captain and the
political and security commissars aboard.
"After unloading in
Havana ... load the containers first and load the 10,000 tons of sugar
(at the next Port) over them so that the containers cannot be seen,"
added the message, found aboard the ship.
"The extraordinary and
extensive efforts to conceal the cargo of arms" and the freighter's
failure to include the weapons in its cargo manifest "point to a clear
and conscious intention to circumvent" the arms embargo, the report
said.
,
Russian trade and industry minister Denis Manturov said that Vladimir
Putin's government is willing to invest at least $200 million in the
airport project - which could also include redeveloping a port and
building a railway line – and that the country was talking with Mubadala
Development Company, the wholly-owned investment company of the
government of Abu Dhabi, to become a partner in the project.
![NEOCASTRISMO [Hacer click en la imagen]](http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_5jy0SZhMlaU/SsuPVOlq2NI/AAAAAAAAH1E/4xt2Bwd2reE/S150/ppo+saturno+jugando+con+sus+hijos.jpg)
