The International Monetary Fund officially announced that China just surpassed the United States as the world’s largest economy, sort of. China’s victory is only on a “Purchasing Power Parity” (PPP) basis. Although Gross Domestic Product is about 50% higher in the U.S., IMF says the total output of goods and services in China are estimated to now be slightly higher than in the U.S.
Many economists complain
that relying on currency exchange rates to calculate Gross Domestic
Product (GDP) as the value of all goods and services is misleading in
comparing real standards of living in different countries. Goods and
services that are not traded across borders, such as medical services,
retail, and constructions services, and haircuts—are almost always
cheaper in poorer countries because of cheap labor. Using exchange rate
driven GDP’s to compare living standards may understate the benefits
that citizens in poor nations enjoy from access to cheaper goods and
services.
Purchasing Power Parity “conversion factor”
is the number of units of a country's currency required to buy the same
amount of goods and services in the domestic market as a U.S. dollar
would buy in the United States. The IMF’s purchasing power parity
estimates--which take into account these differing costs--are considered
an alternative by some analysts as a revealing way of computing and
comparing standards of living and economic size across boundaries
different nations.
According
to the World Bank’s “Price level ratio of PPP conversion factor (GDP)
to market exchange rate”, China’s PPP factor is weighted at about
“0.6”.
To compare the PPP of China versus the PPP of the United States, the IMF essentially converted the latest annualized GDP
estimate in U.S. dollars for China’s third quarter ending September 30.
Multiplying the $10.6 trillion estimate by 1.6667 (conversion factor
reciprocal) equals Purchasing Power Parity for China of $17.6 trillion.
The United States PPP conversion factor is “1.0," since the U.S. GDP is already calculated in U.S. dollars. The latest annualized GDP estimate in U.S. dollars for United States for the third quarter ending September 30 is $17.4 trillion.
The “conversion factor” for China is an arbitrary number that is set
as an estimate of equivalent purchasing power in different nations.
China has enjoyed higher GDP growth rates than the United States, but
about a third of the difference has been higher inflation. This should
tend to narrow the difference in the PPP conversion factor.
If the IMF narrowed the Chinese conversion factor to “0.7”, then the
multiplier to convert GDP to PPP would be only 1.4286. Multiplying the
latest $10.6 trillion annualized GDP for China by the 1.4286 (conversion
factor reciprocal) equals Purchasing Power Parity for China of $15.1
trillion.
For about 2000 years until approximately 1750 AD, China had the
largest population and the largest GDP in the world. China kept the
banner as the most populous country, but lost in GDP to Britain, who
lost it to the United States in 1872.
On an individual basis, China is still a poor country with average per
capita income of $6,807, versus $53,143 in the U.S. Even the most
optimistic analysts do not believe China will pass the U.S. in GDP for
almost a decade.
Many Americans could improve their retirement purchasing power by
moving to China. Medical services, retail and constructions services,
and haircuts are undoubtedly cheaper. But the numerous quality, safety,
and security differences may not be reflected in International Monetary
Fund’s estimates Purchasing Power Parity.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario