By Jaime Suchlicki, suchlicki@miami.edu
Gen.
Raúl Castro’s regime is considering a pardon for Alan Gross, the
American USAID subcontractor arrested in Cuba in December 2009 and
sentenced to 15 years in jail for distributing computers to the Jewish
community in the island. This calculated olive branch to the
just-reelected Obama administration has two objectives. First, to obtain
U.S. concessions in the area of travel by U.S. citizens to Cuba.
Second, to obtain the release of four Cuban spies, serving sentences in
U.S. jails for espionage activities on behalf of the Castro government.
Some
within the Castro regime are arguing that the Obama administration will
be pushed to offer major concessions if Cuba frees Gross. The reasons:
there is a pent-up demand for travel to Cuba; American tourists will
bring much needed dollars; and Cuba’s efficient security apparatus could
control American tourists, primarily interested in visiting Cuban
beaches and less concerned about subverting the Communist regime.
Most
argue that American tourists will have little impact, other than
economic. They point out that over the past several years hundreds of
thousands of Canadian, Europeans and Latin American tourists have
visited the island. There have been no major political changes. Money
from tourists, furthermore, has been flowing into businesses owned by
the Castro government and the Cuban military, thus strengthening state
enterprises.
The
recent migration law enacted by Cuba that eases travel for Cubans to
visit the United States and other countries is also entering into Gen.
Castro’s calculations. The liberalization of Cuban travel will put
pressure on the Obama administration to allow Americans to travel to the
island. From Cuba’s point of view it is a win/win situation. More
Cubans will travel abroad, many staying in the host country or making
their way to the U.S. More American tourists will travel to Cuba leaving
their dollars in the island.
What
should the United States do? Any major policy concession to Cuba will
be out of proportion to the release of an unjustly imprisoned American.
Gross is a hostage being used by the Cuban government to exact change
from the U.S. The history of U.S-Cuba relations has been characterized
by Cuba’s daring actions followed by major U.S. concessions (i.e.
U.S.-Cuba migration accord allowing 20,000 Cubans to enter the United
States following Mariel). The release of Gross should be seen as a
humanitarian gesture requiring no action on the part of the United
States. When Raúl Castro is willing to offer irreversible concessions,
the administration should respond in kind. Ping-pong diplomacy worked
with China. Tit for tat should with Cuba.
Jaime Suchlicki is director of the Institute for Cuban and Cuban-American Studies at the University of Miami.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario