 |
| bweb.blogspot.com |
Q: Did Michelle Obama make $317,000 a year while working part-time at the University of Chicago Medical Center?
A: This
allegation in a chain e-mail is wrong: Obama’s reported income was
$103,633 in 2007, the year she reduced her work schedule to part time.
FULL QUESTION
Is there any truth to this story?
WHERE ARE OUR "WATERGATE" REPORTERS NOW?????
NEW YORK POST ARTICLE
January 24, 2009
Way after we elected this man as the 42nd President of the United States
Despite the fact it was buried on page 17, at least some element of the news media isn’t completely covering for the Obamas.
Date: Thursday, February 12, 2009, 9:25 am
At the top right hand corner of Page 17 of the New York Post of
January 24th, 2009, was a short column entitled "Replacing Michelle" in
the National Review "The Week" column. I found this interesting, so here
it is, word for word, as it appeared:
⬐ Click to expand/collapse the full text ⬏
FULL ANSWER
The anonymous author of this chain e-mail expands upon an opinion
piece from the conservative National Review and gets the facts wrong in
the process.
On Jan. 9, 2009, the University of Chicago Medical Center officially
announced
that Michelle Obama had resigned from her post as vice president for
community and external affairs to join her husband, then-President-elect
Barack Obama, in the White House as the new first lady of the United
States.
Michelle Obama had been
promoted
in 2005 to vice president for community and external affairs after
three years as the executive director for community affairs. It’s true,
as the e-mail (and National Review column) says, that she received a
sizable pay raise that year. She went from earning
$121,910 in 2004 as an executive director at the hospital to making
$316,962
in 2005 as a vice president, according to tax returns filed by the
Obamas for those years. But the suggestion made by the email’s author –
and not made by the National Review – that she was being paid more than
$300,000 for a "20 hour a week job" is not true.
University of Chicago Medical Center spokesman John Easton said Mrs.
Obama didn’t reduce her work schedule from full time to part time until
2007 when it became clear that her husband would run for president. "As
she reduced her hours, beginning early in 2007, her salary decreased
proportionately," Easton told us in an e-mail. "She switched to half
time shortly before her husband formally announced his campaign, then to
20% later that year and to 0% in 2008."
In fact, Mrs. Obama’s income in 2006, a year after her promotion, had decreased to
$273,618. And for 2007 (the year she actually started working part-time), her income was
$103,633,
according to the couple’s tax return for that year. She took an "unpaid
leave of absence to work on her husband’s presidential campaign" in
2008, but still received
$62,709
from the hospital. However, Easton noted that her final reported salary
"consists of accumulated but unused vacation time plus the final payout
from a supplemental executive retirement plan."
Easton said the nearly $317,000 figure is "misleading" anyway because
it includes more than just her salary. He said the figure "also
includes a performance bonus, a one-time signing bonus (she had other,
competing offers at the time), and a one-time mandatory payout from a
terminated retirement plan." This is reflected in the fact that her 2006
earnings were less than in 2005.
The first lady, a graduate of both Princeton University and Harvard Law School, was quite
accomplished before she
joined
the University of Chicago in 1996 and ultimately the medical center in
2002. Her prior work experience included stints as an associate with the
Chicago law firm of Sidley Austin LLP, assistant commissioner of
planning and development in Chicago’s City Hall and executive director
of the Chicago chapter of Public Allies.
Additional Speculation
A significant portion of the text in this
chain e-mail is a reproduction of part of a column that appeared in the
Feb. 9 issue of National Review; the New York Post also ran part of the
magazine’s "The Week" piece on Jan. 24. (The portion of the column
reprinted in this e-mail ends with the comment about Roland Burris’
wife.) It’s worth noting that the column makes some implications about
Michelle Obama’s former job that are more speculation than fact.
For one, the column suggests that Barack Obama’s election to the U.S.
Senate in 2004 had a role in his wife’s promotion and pay increase in
2005. We can’t say what the hospital’s motivation was for promoting her.
But Michael Riordan, who served as the medical center’s president at
the time,
told
the Chicago Tribune that it had nothing to do with her husband. "She
was hired before Barack was Barack,” Riordan told the newspaper. "She is
worth her weight in gold, and she is just terrific." The Tribune
reported that Riordan "had planned early on for the position [of
executive director of community affairs] to evolve into a vice
president’s post as a way of showing the organization’s commitment to
community outreach." Riordan said: "I knew where I wanted to go with
this position. … I wanted to identify someone to grow into it." And
Easton said at the time that her increased salary was in line with those
of other vice presidents at the medical center, who were earning
between $291,000 and $362,000, according to the newspaper.
Second, the column implies that her "networking" was what caused her then-senator husband
to request
a "$1 million earmark for the UC Medical Center" back in 2006. But
that’s unsubstantiated also. He did request the funds for the
"construction of a new hospital pavilion" at the University of Chicago,
but both Obama and hospital officials
denied
that the request was influenced by his wife’s position. And during the
campaign, Obama’s aides were quick to point out that the request was one
of many projects that the former senator made in 2005 and 2006 that
were killed by Congress.
More >>
