 |
| FILE -- March 12, 2014: Ben Emmerson, UN Special Rapporteur on Counter Terrorism and Human Rights speaks during a press conference about his annual report to the Human Rights Council on the use of remotely piloted aircraft, or drones, in extraterritorial lethal counter-terrorism operations, at the European headquarters of the United Nations, in Geneva, Switzerland. (AP Photo/Keystone,Martial Trezzini) |
What country deserves more condemnation for violating human rights
than any other nation on earth? According to the U.N.’s top human rights
body, that would be Israel.
Last week, Israel was the U.N.’s number one women’s rights violator. This week it is the U.N.’s all-round human rights villain.
The U.N. Human Rights Council wrapped up its latest session in Geneva
on Friday, March 27 by adopting four resolutions condemning Israel.
That’s four times more than any of the other 192 UN member states.
Playing at caring about human rights is the U.N. game. And no state does it better than Iran.
There were four resolutions on Israel. And one on North Korea -- a
country that is home to government policies of torture, starvation,
enslavement, rape, disappearances, and murder – to name just some of its
crimes against humanity.
Four resolutions on Israel. And one on Syria. Where the death toll of
four years of war is 100,000 civilians, ten million people are
displaced, and barrel bombs containing chemical agents like chlorine gas
are back in action.
Four resolutions on Israel. And one on Iran. Where there is no rule
of law, no free elections, no freedom of speech, corruption is endemic,
protestors are jailed and tortured, religious minorities are persecuted,
and pedophilia is state-run. At last count, in 2012 Iranian courts
ordered more than 30,000 girls ages 14 and under to be “married.”
And what did that one resolution on Iran say? Co-sponsored by the
United States, it was labelled a “short procedural text,” consisting of
just three operative paragraphs that contained not a single condemnation
of Iran.
The Israel resolutions, on the other hand, were full of “demands,”
“condemns,” “expresses grave concern,” and “deplores” – along with
orders to “cease immediately” a long list of alleged human rights
violations.
Ninety percent of states – inhabited by 6.6 billion people – got no
mention at all. Countries like China, Qatar, Russia, and Saudi Arabia.
For the UN, there was not one human rights violation worthy of mention
by any of these human rights horror shows.
Why not? For starters, China, Qatar, Russia and Saudi Arabia are all
members of the UN Human Rights Council. Actually protecting human rights
is not a condition of being elected to the Council, and thereby
transforming into a UN authority on what counts as a human rights
violation.
As a result, what counts fast becomes unrecognizable. Subverting
human rights principles for all turns out to be the other side of the
coin from subverting human rights for Jews.
Thus at this session, “death to America” Iran sponsored a Council
resolution called “Enhancement of international cooperation in the field
of human rights.” It was adopted by consensus – with U.S. blessing.
The Cubans successfully engineered a Council resolution on protecting “cultural rights” – minus free expression.
The Palestinians – whose unity government includes the terrorist
group Hamas – co-sponsored the resolution “effects of terrorism on the
enjoyment of human rights.”
The Organization of Islamic Cooperation – representing states where
converting to Christianity is subject to the death penalty – sponsored a
resolution called “combating intolerance of persons based on religion
or belief.”
Playing at caring about human rights is the U.N. game. And no state does it better than Iran.
Iran’s human rights record happened to come up at the March session
in the context of what the Council calls a “universal periodic review”
(UPR). Touted as its leading human rights innovation, the same process
is applied to every state every four years.
That means Iran and Syria get treated the same way as, say, the
United States and Canada. At the end of the UPR, a report is summarily
adopted containing a bunch of recommendations that the former cast of
characters summarily dismiss.
It was suggested to Iran, for instance, that it stop peddling little
girls as sex slaves for old men. The recommendation received this reply:
“in light of Islamic teachings, a person that has reached the age of
maturity and is of sound mind has the possibility of marrying.”
The Council created a human rights investigator on Iran, but Iran has
never let him into the country. Recommendations made to Iran during
the UPR that it cooperate, were simply ignored.
On March 19, 2014, the U.S. representative mustered all her courage
and countered with this: “we note with disappointment that Iran has not
addressed the issue of allowing the Special Rapporteur on the situation
of human rights in Iran to visit the country…”
There is an alternative conclusion. We note with disappointment that
the United States legitimizes this travesty and empowers the real
enemies of human rights.
--------------------- Anne Bayefsky is director of the Touro Institute on Human Rights and the Holocaust.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario