There has been swift reaction
following news of the release of American contractor Alan Gross after
five years imprisonment in Cuba and the expected announcements on
changes to hardline U.S. policy towards Cuba that the administration on
Tuesday decreed had not been working.
Senator Robert Menendez,
(D-NJ), one of two Cuban American U.S. senators, has been an outspoken
opponent of the Castro government and has not advocated for lifting the
economic embargo against Cuba, in place since 1960.
"This is a moment of
profound relief for Alan Gross and his family. Mr. Gross' physical and
mental health has declined severely as a result of his five-year
imprisonment under difficult conditions. He should have been released
immediately and unconditionally five years ago," said Menendez in a
statement. "He committed no crime and was simply working to provide
Internet access to Cuba's small Jewish community. His imprisonment was
cruel and arbitrary, but consistent with the behavior of the Cuban
regime."
Menendez blasted the
news that the U.S. was releasing three members of the "Cuban 5" who had
been imprisoned in the U.S. after conspiracy and spying convictions.
Senior administration officials said on the condition of anonymity that
the Cubans' release was in exchange for a swap for a U.S. intelligence
asset whom they did not identify by name, but whom they said had been
imprisoned in Cuba for 20 years and was responsible for important
intelligence prosecutions, including of the Cuban 5 and Ana Belén
Montes, a former U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency analyst who had spied
for Cuba. The administration said Gross' release was released on
humanitarian grounds by Cuba.
"President Obama's
actions have vindicated the brutal behavior of the Cuban government.
There is no equivalence between an international aid worker and
convicted spies who were found guilty of conspiracy to commit espionage
against our nation. One spy was also convicted of conspiracy to murder
for his role in the 1996 tragedy in which the Cuban military shot down
two U.S. civilian planes, killing several American citizens. My heart
goes out to the American families that lost love ones on that fateful
day," Menendez stated.
Sen. Marco Rubio,
R-Florida, criticized the announced policy changes and said on his
Twitter accounty he plans "to make every effort to block this dangerous
& desperate attempt by (Obama) to burnish his legacy at the Cuban
people's expense"
Although Obama can make
some of the changes, such as starting talks about an opening an embassy
in Havana, can be done administratively, Congress has to change laws on
things such as travel rules and lifting the embargo.
Though some
Cuban-Americans share Menendez's more hardline stance against the Cuban
government, Wednesday's news follows what has been increasingly evolving
attitudes towards Cuba.
"This does not need to
be a relationship that is frozen in time," a senior administration
official told reporters in a conference call Tuesday morning.
As news trickled out,
groups such as #CubaNow that had implored Cuban-Americans during
election season to vote "to protect their right to travel to Cuba to see
their families sending a strong message to politicians who continue to
cling to failed hardline policies."
"It is well within the
President's authority to improve our ability to support the Cuban
people, including the growing class of independent entrepreneurs and to
bolster civil society on the island," said Ric Herrero, president of
#CubaNow.
Ramon Saul Sanchez, a
Miami-based human rights activist and president of Democracy Movement
has been active in the Cuban-American community for 45 years, undergoing
five hunger strikes, but he has never supported the U.S. embargo on
Cuba. He is open to changes in Cuba if the island reciprocates and
allows political descent and allows people like him to travel to his
homeland.
Speaking before the president's announcement on Cuba changes, Sanchez said:
"The changes that may be
introduced represent a large question mark to the Cuban population.
They may also present an opportunity for change in Cuba. A closed
society can only be changed when you are able to have people to people
contact … And also provide them with communications."
In Florida, a major
battleground state in U.S. politics, discussions of lifting or easing
the embargo and softening relations toward Cuba have always been
treacherous.
A Florida International University poll
during the summer showed slightly over half of Miami-area Cuban
Americans favored lifting the U.S. embargo against Cuba, as well as
lifting travel restrictions and establishing diplomatic relations, NBC News reported.
It's results came admid other surveys showing similar thawing of
hardened views towards Cuba, particularly among younger and more
recently arrived Cubans.
However, more than two
thirds of Cuban Americans felt the country should remain on a list of
four countries designated as state sponsors of terrorism.
Herrero's group had run a
television ad in October featuring Cuban-American families divided
between Cuba and the U.S. who told how 2009 changes in travel
restrictions allowed them to reunite with family. Before 2009,
Cuban-Americans could only travel to Cuba once every three years and
faced tougher restrictions on sending money home to family in Cuba.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario