The Supreme Court delivered a blow Thursday to President Obama,
ruling that he went too far in making recess appointments to the
National Labor Relations Board.
In a unanimous decision,
the high court sided with Senate Republicans and limited the
president's power to fill high-level vacancies with temporary
appointments. It was the first-ever Supreme Court test involving the
long-standing practice of presidents naming appointees when the Senate
is on break.
In this case, Obama had argued that the Senate was on an extended
holiday break when he filled slots at the NLRB in 2012. He argued the
brief sessions it held every three days were a sham that was intended to
prevent him from filling the seats.
The justices rejected that argument, though, declaring the Senate was
not actually in a formal recess when Obama acted during that three-day
window.
Justice Stephen Breyer said in his majority opinion that a
congressional break has to last at least 10 days to be considered a
recess under the Constitution.
"Three days is too short a time to bring a recess within the scope of
the Clause. Thus we conclude that the President lacked the power to
make the recess appointments here at issue," Breyer wrote.
At the same time, the court upheld the general authority of the president to make recess appointments.
Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell, among those who criticized
the president for unilaterally filling the NLRB slots, applauded the
high court decision on Thursday.
"The president made an unprecedented power grab by placing political
allies at a powerful federal agency while the Senate was meeting
regularly and without even bothering to wait for its advice and
consent," he said in a statement. "A unanimous Supreme Court has
rejected this brazen power-grab."
On a separate track, House Speaker John Boehner said a day earlier he
plans to proceed with a lawsuit against the president over his alleged
abuse of executive power.
Reacting to the Supreme Court decision on Thursday, White House Press
Secretary Josh Earnest said the administration is "deeply disappointed"
in the ruling. He said that while the administration disagrees with the
decision, it will honor it.
The issue of recess appointments receded in importance after the
Senate's Democratic majority changed the rules to make it harder for
Republicans to block confirmation of most Obama appointees.
But the ruling's impact may be keenly felt by the White House next
year if Republicans capture control of the Senate in the November
election. The potential importance of the ruling lies in the Senate's
ability to block the confirmation of judges and the leaders of
independent agencies like the NLRB. A federal law gives the president
the power to appoint acting heads of Cabinet-level departments to keep
the government running.
Still, the outcome could have been worse for the administration. The
justices, by a 5-4 vote, rejected a sweeping lower court ruling against
the administration that would have made it virtually impossible for any
future president to make recess appointments.
The lower court held that the only recess recognized by the
Constitution is the once-a-year break between sessions of Congress. It
also said that only vacancies that arise in that recess could be filled.
So the high court has left open the possibility that a president, with a
compliant Congress, could make recess appointments in the future.
The case decided Thursday arose out of a dispute between the NLRB and
a Pepsi-Cola distributor, Noel Canning. The NLRB had ruled against him
in a labor dispute, but Canning argued that three of the five board
members were improperly appointed.
A recess appointment can last no more than two years. Recess
appointees who subsequently won Senate confirmation include Chief
Justice Earl Warren and Justice William Brennan, Federal Reserve
Chairman Alan Greenspan, two current NLRB members and Consumer Financial
Protection Bureau director Richard Cordray. Former UN Ambassador John
Bolton is among recess appointees who left office because they could not
win a Senate vote.
The Associated Press contributed to this report.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario