A forensic profiler whose previous cases have included the Natalie Holloway disappearance and the O.J. Simpson double murder says Barack Obama is confessing to stealing the 2012 president election.
“Obama appears to unconsciously confess on multiple occasions that in
his secret fury he stole the 2012 presidential election – continuing
his attacks on our nation,” Andrew G. Hodges, M.D., told WND in an
assessment of Obama.
“But really that is no different whatsoever than in 2008 becoming an
illegal president who violated the Constitution. This knowledge comes
from one undeniable fact: we have discovered a new unconscious mind that
continually quick-reads situations and communicates about it – as Obama
reveals.”
Hodges, who wrote “The Obama Confession: Secret Fear, Secret Fury,” previously deciphered the JonBenet Ramsey ransom note from the Boulder, Colo., murder case.
He uses a unique psycholinguistic technique he calls “ThoughtPrint
Decoding” to “read between the lines” of people’s statements – called
“the cutting-edge of forensic science” by expert investigators. He’s not
exactly new to the field, already having identified killers by studying
ransom notes, emails, letters and police interviews to spot secret
confessions. He decoded O.J.’s “suicide note” to confirm Simpson had
committed a double murder. He deciphered the JonBenet ransom note from
Boulder, Colo., to identify the child’s killer. He decrypted letters
from BTK to predict that he was about to kill again – the only profiler
to do so. He studied statements by Joran van der Sloot and Deepak Kalpoe
to tie them to the slaying of Holloway. He showed how Casey Anthony
secretly confessed to killing her daughter in 200 letters written to a
jail mate. He even decoded Bill Clinton’s Lewinsky comments.
In a new analysis for WND, Hodges explains that Obama not only confesses, but he suggests a solution for Americans.
“Obama’s deeper moral compass continues to provide guidance to
America on how to combat his assaults. In his U.N. speech he repeatedly
referred to courageous protesters. ‘They should give us hope… remind us
that so long as we work for it justice will be done; that history is on
our side; and that a rising tide of liberty will never be reversed.’
Repeatedly, he tells us ‘protest,’ ‘march for justice’ and we can become
a rising tide. Citizens still have the power,” Hodges said.
That there are questions about the 2012 election has been reported numerous times by WND.
In Hodges’ assessment: “Following Obama’s presidential reelection
impressive findings have emerged pointing to a fraudulent election. A
brief summary reveals precincts in Ohio and Pennsylvania reported
greater than 100 percent of registered voters turned out to vote. In 100
precincts in Ohio Obama got 99 percent of the votes. Pennsylvania
illegally removed GOP poll inspectors from voting locations. Computer
irregularities in Pennsylvania (and elsewhere) reverted to a default
Obama vote no matter who the voter selected.”
He continued, “Florida prevented absentee ballots from being observed
by neutral observers. Military ballots were systematically denied
active-duty servicemen and women around the world.”
So he said all he had to do was sit back and wait for the confession.
“One thing is for certain – if Obama stole this election he would
confess unconsciously. We now review that possibility from his own mind,
listening for his all-seeing unconscious super intelligence to once
more tell us how he truly sees himself deep down. As I described in my
book, ‘The Obama Confession: Secret Fear, Secret Fury,’ Obama has
repeatedly confessed to his misdeeds of his illegal presidency and
sweeping attack on America for four years.”
He explains his observations:
“On election night after initial voting reports declared him the
winner, Obama once more unconsciously pointed to a confession. Before
his anxious and relieved supporters, Obama spoke of his pride in his
daughters but commented, ‘But I will say this for now, one dog’s
probably enough’ – on the surface referring back to promising his
daughters a puppy after his 2008 victory,” Hodges said.
“But stay with his spontaneous right-brain image. Understand he could
have chosen any matter on which to comment and any description but his
brilliant unconscious mind which always speaks in a symbolic right-brain
language – and carefully chooses its images – selected ‘one dog is
enough.’
“Read his confession that America has just elected a dog of a president – and once was enough,” Hodges said.
“He suggests that he’s dogging it as president, faking it as an
illegal president in a second way now with a stolen election. That he’s a
real ‘dog’ for such deception. The image of a dog further suggests: a
pet favored by the media and blind supporters who would not dare to
explore his illegality by birth or unfair election; that he will dog or
haunt America for another four years because a dog also bites especially
a wounded one. (And Obama is deeply wounded beyond belief.) Once again
Obama unconsciously points to his deceptive anger and indeed he has
bitten/assaulted America in multiple ways, both covert and overt, and
plans on more of the same.”
It was interesting, Hodges noted, that Time magazine also then
referred to the “dog” image, using it extensively to declare, “It was a
fitting end to a one-dog’s-enough sort of campaign.”
“The magazine writer suggests that he had picked up deep down on Obama’s unconscious confession,” Hodges said.
Further, during a Nov. 9 press conference, “Obama snapped at two
senators who had criticized U.S. Ambassador Susan Rice for her erroneous
declarations regarding the Benghazi attack. He challenged the senators
to ‘come after me,’ not Rice,” Hodges said.
“This matches his hidden instructions in the U.N. speech that
American citizens be prepared to protest unfair elections. In both his
2008 Fathers’ Day speech as a candidate and in his inaugural address he
unconsciously instructed citizens to confront him as an illegal
foreign-born candidate/ president,” Hodges said.
“Obama’s ideas continually reflect a preoccupation with unconscious
guilt and a need to be caught and stopped. His behavior and
decision-making around the Benghazi tragedy with obvious cover-up
suggest more guilt – a need to be questioned, a secret confession of
being a weak leader and a president who puts a U.S. ambassador’s life at
risk,” said Hodges.
He said the newest messages shine new light on Obama’s July 13, 2012,
statement that, “If you’ve got a business, you didn’t build that.
Somebody else made that happen.”
“The symbolic unconscious message (with a deeper context of a
potential vote scam) is not difficult to discern: ‘If I stay in business
as president, it won’t be because of me. I’m not really the one who
will bring about my reelection – others are going to make sure it
happens,’” Hodges said. “His headline-grabbing comment has all the
earmarks that he was warning America – attempting to shock everyone into
grasping – that a secret plan was taking shape to guarantee his
reelection.”
Hodges also cited Obama’s Sept. 25 address to the U.N., saying Obama
was “confessing to his illegal presidency and an unfair election in
2008. In retrospect – now that evidence points to the real possibility
of a fraudulent election – Obama suggests his brilliant always truthful
super-intel was also looking ahead and confessing that plans were
underway to steal the election.”
On Hodges’ website,
Steven A. Egger, associate professor of criminology at the University of
Houston, Clear Lake, has written that Hodges’ technique is “becoming
the cutting edge of forensic science.”
“Dr. Hodges’ investigation of forensic documents in the Natalee
Holloway case indicates that his ‘thoughtprint decoding method’ and
‘reading between the lines’ is, in fact, becoming a major contribution
to law enforcement tools used by criminal investigators,” wrote Egger.See the BIG LIST of vote fraud reports coming out of the 2012 election.
WND’s newest forum is your opportunity to report voter fraud
Stand up to fight against voter fraud right now!
Here’s the blueprint Obama used to steal the 2012 election.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario