International Theory, 2012/ Martin Holbraad and Morten Axel Pedersen
Abstract
This article proposes an
anthropological extension of the so-called Copenhagen School theory of
securitization in International Relations. In contrast to existing
attempts to show how, suitably elaborated, this model can be ‘applied’
to various non-Western contexts, our anthropological strategy is to use
the contingency of empirical materials (namely the Cuban Revolution and
the political forms it instantiates) as a means for transforming the
basic coordinates of the model itself. The argument involves two main
steps. First we relativize the Copenhagen School model, showing the
contingency of its premises. In its paradigmatic form, we argue, the
model is liberal in that its abiding concern with states of emergency
turns on an ontological distinction between political subjects (e.g.
people) and political structures (e.g. state). By contrast,
revolutionary politics in Cuba concertedly rescinds just this
distinction, to bring about an alternative, non-liberal political
ontology. We then go on to use the Cuban case to construct an
alternative model of securitization, which we call revolutionary. On
this model, the move of securitization pertains, not to a passage from
ordinary politics into a realm of emergency, but to a deliberate
ontological fusion of the two, such that rule and exception also become
coterminous.
http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=8614937
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario